selemedia.org

Tag: South Africa

  • Over 130 Nigerians Register For South Africa Evacuation

    Reported by Afilawos Magana Sur, Managing Editor | Journalist at Sele Media Africa.

    Pretoria, South Africa — More than 130 Nigerians have registered for voluntary evacuation from South Africa as Nigeria responds to renewed anti-foreigner tensions and reported attacks on foreign nationals in parts of the country. Nigeria’s Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, said the federal government and the Nigerian High Commission in Pretoria had begun coordinating the return process.

    The move marks one of the clearest diplomatic responses yet to the latest wave of fear inside Nigerian migrant communities in South Africa. Odumegwu-Ojukwu said the evacuation effort followed directives from President Bola Tinubu, while Nigerian missions in South Africa continued to document affected citizens and provide consular support.

    What Triggered The Evacuation Push

    The current alarm followed reports of anti-foreigner demonstrations in South Africa between April 27 and April 29, 2026, alongside warnings from Nigerian missions that tensions could rise further. Nigeria’s Consulate General in Johannesburg warned citizens to remain cautious ahead of planned protests in major cities, including Johannesburg, Pretoria, Cape Town and Durban.

    Channels Television reported on April 25, 2026 that the advisory followed an official circular from the Nigerian Consulate General in Johannesburg, which said protests in East London, Cape Town, Durban and KwaZulu-Natal had already turned violent in some places, with looting, property damage and injuries reported. That report also said South African law enforcement had been notified.

    Vanguard later reported that the federal government said about 130 Nigerians had already registered for evacuation. The same report said the ministry continued to track the safety of Nigerians in South Africa and that another round of demonstrations remained possible between May 4 and May 8, 2026.

    Consular Response And Official Monitoring

    The Nigerian High Commission in Pretoria has remained central to the response. Odumegwu-Ojukwu said the mission had continued to document Nigerians who wanted to leave and to coordinate with Pretoria-based officials on the evacuation logistics.

    That approach reflects a broader diplomatic effort to avoid panic while protecting citizens. Nigerian officials have urged residents to remain law-abiding, maintain contact with the mission and avoid actions that could expose them to retaliation or arrest during the protests.

    The evacuation also shows how quickly public anxiety can move from warning to action. In a separate safety advisory, the High Commission in Pretoria had already asked Nigerian nationals to observe heightened caution amid what it described as palpable tension in the country.

    South Africa’s Repeated Xenophobia Fears

    South African authorities have repeatedly condemned xenophobia in recent years, but the latest warnings show that migrant communities still view the threat as real. Recent media coverage has described tension in Eastern Cape, Gauteng and other provinces, where foreign-owned businesses and migrant residents have faced pressure, intimidation or violence.

    AFP fact-checkers also verified that a March 2026 anti-migrant march in East London formed part of the wider wave of tensions now drawing diplomatic concern. That context matters because misinformation and old images have also circulated online, adding to fear among migrants and their families.

    For Nigerians living in South Africa, the immediate concern centers on safety, business continuity and family separation. Even when demonstrations remain partly peaceful, the threat of looting or sudden violence often forces shop owners, students and workers to stay home, close businesses or leave areas altogether.

    Why Nigeria Acted Now

    Nigeria’s decision to support voluntary evacuation shows that the federal government wants to prevent a repeat of earlier episodes in which diplomatic tension escalated after violence on the ground. Odumegwu-Ojukwu said the ministry also wanted to ensure that Nigerians who chose to remain received protection and timely information.

    The move also follows a pattern of formal advisories issued by Nigerian missions. The Johannesburg consulate warned that planned protests could disrupt several major urban centres, and that security agencies in South Africa had been informed to help maintain order.

    That warning reflects a practical concern: tensions can intensify fastest in commercial districts where migrant-owned businesses operate. Nigerian traders, students and professionals often form part of local economies in South Africa, so even short-lived unrest can have immediate financial consequences for both communities and host cities.

    Impact Beyond One Border

    The situation matters far beyond Nigeria and South Africa. Nigeria-South Africa relations already carry the weight of trade, migration and recurring diplomatic disputes, and xenophobic flare-ups can quickly affect investment sentiment, diaspora confidence and continental mobility.

    For Africa’s broader integration agenda, the episode lands at an awkward moment. As governments promote freer movement under the African Continental Free Trade Area, repeated attacks or threats against migrants weaken trust in regional openness and expose the gap between policy and lived reality.

    The crisis also resonates in other African corridors where migrants face hostility during economic downturns. South Africa, Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya and Uganda all confront the challenge of balancing public frustration, law enforcement and the protection of foreign nationals who contribute to local commerce and labour markets.

    What Happens Next

    The immediate test now rests with the evacuation logistics and South African policing. If the protests scheduled for early May 2026 proceed, Nigerian missions will likely keep updating citizens while the federal government decides how many evacuees can travel on the first flights.

    For the more than 130 Nigerians already registered, the next few days will determine whether they leave safely or stay and ride out the unrest. For Abuja and Pretoria, the deeper challenge lies in preventing the current tension from hardening into another cycle of fear, retaliation and diplomatic strain.

    Sources:

    • Punch Newspapers, “130 Nigerians register for evacuation from South Africa amid xenophobic tensions,” May 2026.
    • Channels Television, “Be cautious, FG alerts Nigerians in S’Africa to planned anti-foreigner demonstrations,” April 2026.
    • Vanguard News, “Xenophobia: Nigeria warns citizens ahead of Monday anti-foreigner protests in South Africa,” May 2026.
    • Vanguard News, “No Nigerian killed in South Africa protest – FG,” May 2026.
    • Vanguard News, “NANS urges calm as tensions rise among Nigerians in S/Africa,” May 2026.
    • Guardian Nigeria, “High Commission issues safety advisory to Nigerians in South Africa,” April 2026.
    • AFP Fact Check, South Africa xenophobia-related image verification, April 2026.
    • Guardian Nigeria, Nigeria-South Africa trade and integration commentary, April 2026.
    • Sele Media Africa, related past coverage if applicable, https://selemedia.org/

  • Over 130 Nigerians Register For South Africa Evacuation

    Reported by Afilawos Magana Sur, Managing Editor | Journalist at Sele Media Africa.

    Pretoria, South Africa — More than 130 Nigerians have registered for voluntary evacuation from South Africa as Nigeria responds to renewed anti-foreigner tensions and reported attacks on foreign nationals in parts of the country. Nigeria’s Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, said the federal government and the Nigerian High Commission in Pretoria had begun coordinating the return process.

    The move marks one of the clearest diplomatic responses yet to the latest wave of fear inside Nigerian migrant communities in South Africa. Odumegwu-Ojukwu said the evacuation effort followed directives from President Bola Tinubu, while Nigerian missions in South Africa continued to document affected citizens and provide consular support.

    What Triggered The Evacuation Push

    The current alarm followed reports of anti-foreigner demonstrations in South Africa between April 27 and April 29, 2026, alongside warnings from Nigerian missions that tensions could rise further. Nigeria’s Consulate General in Johannesburg warned citizens to remain cautious ahead of planned protests in major cities, including Johannesburg, Pretoria, Cape Town and Durban.

    Channels Television reported on April 25, 2026 that the advisory followed an official circular from the Nigerian Consulate General in Johannesburg, which said protests in East London, Cape Town, Durban and KwaZulu-Natal had already turned violent in some places, with looting, property damage and injuries reported. That report also said South African law enforcement had been notified.

    Vanguard later reported that the federal government said about 130 Nigerians had already registered for evacuation. The same report said the ministry continued to track the safety of Nigerians in South Africa and that another round of demonstrations remained possible between May 4 and May 8, 2026.

    Consular Response And Official Monitoring

    The Nigerian High Commission in Pretoria has remained central to the response. Odumegwu-Ojukwu said the mission had continued to document Nigerians who wanted to leave and to coordinate with Pretoria-based officials on the evacuation logistics.

    That approach reflects a broader diplomatic effort to avoid panic while protecting citizens. Nigerian officials have urged residents to remain law-abiding, maintain contact with the mission and avoid actions that could expose them to retaliation or arrest during the protests.

    The evacuation also shows how quickly public anxiety can move from warning to action. In a separate safety advisory, the High Commission in Pretoria had already asked Nigerian nationals to observe heightened caution amid what it described as palpable tension in the country.

    South Africa’s Repeated Xenophobia Fears

    South African authorities have repeatedly condemned xenophobia in recent years, but the latest warnings show that migrant communities still view the threat as real. Recent media coverage has described tension in Eastern Cape, Gauteng and other provinces, where foreign-owned businesses and migrant residents have faced pressure, intimidation or violence.

    AFP fact-checkers also verified that a March 2026 anti-migrant march in East London formed part of the wider wave of tensions now drawing diplomatic concern. That context matters because misinformation and old images have also circulated online, adding to fear among migrants and their families.

    For Nigerians living in South Africa, the immediate concern centers on safety, business continuity and family separation. Even when demonstrations remain partly peaceful, the threat of looting or sudden violence often forces shop owners, students and workers to stay home, close businesses or leave areas altogether.

    Why Nigeria Acted Now

    Nigeria’s decision to support voluntary evacuation shows that the federal government wants to prevent a repeat of earlier episodes in which diplomatic tension escalated after violence on the ground. Odumegwu-Ojukwu said the ministry also wanted to ensure that Nigerians who chose to remain received protection and timely information.

    The move also follows a pattern of formal advisories issued by Nigerian missions. The Johannesburg consulate warned that planned protests could disrupt several major urban centres, and that security agencies in South Africa had been informed to help maintain order.

    That warning reflects a practical concern: tensions can intensify fastest in commercial districts where migrant-owned businesses operate. Nigerian traders, students and professionals often form part of local economies in South Africa, so even short-lived unrest can have immediate financial consequences for both communities and host cities.

    Impact Beyond One Border

    The situation matters far beyond Nigeria and South Africa. Nigeria-South Africa relations already carry the weight of trade, migration and recurring diplomatic disputes, and xenophobic flare-ups can quickly affect investment sentiment, diaspora confidence and continental mobility.

    For Africa’s broader integration agenda, the episode lands at an awkward moment. As governments promote freer movement under the African Continental Free Trade Area, repeated attacks or threats against migrants weaken trust in regional openness and expose the gap between policy and lived reality.

    The crisis also resonates in other African corridors where migrants face hostility during economic downturns. South Africa, Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya and Uganda all confront the challenge of balancing public frustration, law enforcement and the protection of foreign nationals who contribute to local commerce and labour markets.

    What Happens Next

    The immediate test now rests with the evacuation logistics and South African policing. If the protests scheduled for early May 2026 proceed, Nigerian missions will likely keep updating citizens while the federal government decides how many evacuees can travel on the first flights.

    For the more than 130 Nigerians already registered, the next few days will determine whether they leave safely or stay and ride out the unrest. For Abuja and Pretoria, the deeper challenge lies in preventing the current tension from hardening into another cycle of fear, retaliation and diplomatic strain.

    Sources:

    • Punch Newspapers, “130 Nigerians register for evacuation from South Africa amid xenophobic tensions,” May 2026.
    • Channels Television, “Be cautious, FG alerts Nigerians in S’Africa to planned anti-foreigner demonstrations,” April 2026.
    • Vanguard News, “Xenophobia: Nigeria warns citizens ahead of Monday anti-foreigner protests in South Africa,” May 2026.
    • Vanguard News, “No Nigerian killed in South Africa protest – FG,” May 2026.
    • Vanguard News, “NANS urges calm as tensions rise among Nigerians in S/Africa,” May 2026.
    • Guardian Nigeria, “High Commission issues safety advisory to Nigerians in South Africa,” April 2026.
    • AFP Fact Check, South Africa xenophobia-related image verification, April 2026.
    • Guardian Nigeria, Nigeria-South Africa trade and integration commentary, April 2026.
    • Sele Media Africa, related past coverage if applicable, https://selemedia.org/

  • Nigeria Issues Security Alert as South Africa Violence Spreads

    Reported by Afilawos Magana Sur, Managing Editor | Journalist at Sele Media Africa.

    JOHANNESBURG, South Africa — Nigeria has issued an urgent security advisory for its citizens in South Africa after xenophobic attacks spread into Johannesburg and Durban this week, forcing traders to shut shops and families to flee homes. The Nigerians in Diaspora Commission said the warning followed a consular circular from Johannesburg on April 22, 2026, as violence and looting intensified in several South African cities.

    The alert marks another sharp escalation in South Africa’s recurring anti-foreigner unrest, a pattern that has repeatedly put Nigerian traders, Ghanaian migrants, Ethiopian shopkeepers and other African nationals at risk. NiDCOM told Nigerians to avoid crowded areas, stop confronting protesters and follow local media for safety updates.

    Businesses Closed, Families Displaced

    TheCable reported on April 24, 2026 that NiDCOM told Nigerians in South Africa to shut their businesses and stay away from confrontation as attacks spread. The commission said the advisory followed a circular from the Nigerian Consulate General in Johannesburg, which warned that demonstrations had turned violent and foreign-owned shops had come under attack.

    NiDCOM also said the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the consulate were working with South African authorities through the early warning mechanism recently signed by both governments. In its statement, the commission said the consular team had engaged police authorities and that further steps would move to ministerial level if the situation worsened.

    Johannesburg And Durban Under Pressure

    The unrest matters because Johannesburg and Durban anchor major retail, transport and trading networks that support migrant livelihoods and cross-border commerce. When violent mobs target foreign-owned shops in those cities, the shock spreads quickly through informal markets, remittance flows and household incomes across Nigeria and South Africa.

    NiDCOM said the latest trouble began with demonstrations in East London, Cape Town and KwaZulu-Natal before reaching other high-density areas. The commission advised citizens to keep away from protest zones, monitor local radio and television, and wait for official updates rather than move through volatile neighbourhoods.

    What Nigeria Told Its Citizens

    The Federal Government has repeatedly warned Nigerians to avoid high-risk areas whenever xenophobic violence spikes in South Africa. In a NiDCOM statement on earlier attacks, the government said it engaged the Nigerian High Commission in Pretoria, the Consulate General in Johannesburg and South African authorities to protect lives and property.

    The commission’s April 2026 advisory follows the same playbook: stay indoors when possible, avoid confrontation, and report threats through official channels. That guidance reflects a hard lesson from previous waves of xenophobic unrest, when looting and street violence left many migrants with no safe route to work, school or home.

    Why Xenophobia Keeps Returning

    South Africa has faced repeated anti-foreigner violence for more than a decade, with migrants often blamed for unemployment, crime and competition for informal trade. AFP’s previous reporting on similar unrest in Johannesburg and Durban showed how quickly attacks on shopkeepers can escalate into looting, arson and forced displacement.

    That history matters now because the latest alert does not describe an isolated incident. It points to a familiar cycle in which protests, rumour and economic frustration converge, and foreign traders become visible targets in crowded commercial districts.

    What The Consulate Is Doing

    NiDCOM said the Nigerian Consul General, Godwin Adama, had already moved to the affected area and was meeting senior police officials. The commission said the mission intervened immediately and that a meeting with Nigerians and South African police would follow.

    That response shows the limits and the importance of consular diplomacy during street violence. Consulates can warn citizens, coordinate with police and push for protection, but they cannot substitute for rapid law enforcement or political restraint on the ground. This is an inference from the official statements and the pattern of previous attacks.

    Rights, Duties And Policing

    The South African state carries the duty to protect everyone on its territory, including foreign nationals, under its constitutional and policing obligations. NiDCOM’s statements make clear that Nigeria expects arrests, prosecution and visible policing, not only diplomatic language.

    The commission also linked the current response to the early warning signal mechanism recently signed by Nigeria and South Africa. That step matters because it gives both governments a formal channel to react before local tension turns into mass violence.

    Pan-African Stakes Beyond One Crisis

    This crisis reaches far beyond Nigeria and South Africa. Ghanaian traders, Ethiopian shopkeepers and other African migrants have faced similar attacks in South Africa before, while countries such as Kenya and Senegal also watch these episodes closely because they affect mobility, investment confidence and the safety of African workers abroad.

    For the continent, the episode tests whether African states can protect one another’s citizens while preserving the principle of free movement and regional integration. It also raises a broader governance question for South Africa, Nigeria and other African economies that rely on migrant labour, informal trade and diaspora remittances to sustain growth.

    What Happens Next

    The next step depends on whether South African police contain the unrest in Johannesburg, Durban and the other affected cities, and whether Nigerian officials can secure safer conditions for their citizens. If the violence spreads further, Abuja may escalate the matter diplomatically, while families already displaced will need emergency assistance, relocation support and clear communication from both governments.

    For now, the warning stands as a blunt reminder that xenophobic violence still carries real costs across Africa’s largest economies. The outcome will matter not only for Nigerians in South Africa, but also for the credibility of African governments that promise protection for their citizens abroad.

    Sources:

    • TheCable, reported that NiDCOM told Nigerians in South Africa to close shops and avoid confrontations, April 2026
    • Nigerians in Diaspora Commission, statement on renewed attacks on Nigerians in South Africa, April 2026
    • Nigerians in Diaspora Commission, earlier statement on xenophobic attacks in South Africa, 2025
    • AFP, background reporting on xenophobic violence in South Africa, April 2015 and April 2016.

  • Tshwane Tender Scandal Deepens As Commission Grills Mnisi!

    Reported by Musa Antiketu, Journalist at Sele Media Africa.

    PRETORIA, South Africa — The Madlanga Commission on Tuesday pressed suspended City of Tshwane chief financial officer Gareth Mnisi over allegations that his friendship with suspended police officer Fannie Nkosi shaped multimillion-rand security tenders in the municipality. The inquiry also heard claims that tender recommendations may have come before bid scoring, a sequence that could point to fraud.

    Mnisi denied that he shared confidential tender information with Nkosi. He also rejected suggestions that he helped politically connected or improperly interested parties influence procurement outcomes at the City of Tshwane.

    The testimony intensified scrutiny of the municipality’s procurement controls at a time when Tshwane already faces public pressure over governance, discipline, and possible corruption. It also widened the commission’s focus from one tender dispute into a broader examination of how senior officials, police officers, and political networks may have intersected inside the capital’s administration.

    Tender Questions Move To Centre Stage

    Advocate Matthew Chaskalson, the evidence leader, told the commission that the sequence around the TMPD-3 tender raised serious concerns. SABC News reported that Chaskalson said recommendations for the tender came before bids were scored, while Mnisi insisted the documents remained secure despite missing files.

    That allegation matters because procurement law depends on documented, sequential, and auditable steps. If officials recommended a winner before scoring bids, they would undermine the fairness of the process and expose the municipality to claims of fraud or unlawful award decisions. That inference follows from the commission testimony reported by SABC News and the EWN account of alleged irregularities.

    EWN reported on Monday, April 20, 2026, that Mnisi faced questions over a list of seven companies sent by Nkosi in March 2025, along with messages relating to tender matters. The outlet said Mnisi admitted friendship with Nkosi but denied helping a company linked to Nkosi’s brother secure work from the city.

    Missing Papers, Missing Confidence

    SABC News reported on Tuesday, April 21, 2026, that the commission heard six tender documents went missing. Mnisi rejected allegations that the disappearance meant manipulation, but the missing paperwork deepens concern over record-keeping inside a high-value procurement process.

    That concern carries practical consequences. Public procurement depends on the retention of bid files, scoring sheets, and recommendation records so auditors, councillors, investigators, and courts can test whether officials treated bidders equally. When those records go missing, the municipality weakens its own defence and strengthens suspicion. This assessment draws on the evidence reported from the commission hearings.

    The commission also heard that Nkosi possessed a confidential draft report related to the security tender, according to SABC News. That revelation links the procurement dispute to possible unauthorized access to internal city information, a point that could widen the investigation beyond the finance office and into police-municipal contacts.

    Nkosi Link Under Scrutiny

    EWN reported on April 18, 2026, that Mnisi denied helping Nkosi’s brother win a Tshwane tender and said he and Nkosi remained friends. The same report said the commission questioned Mnisi about whether he had shared information with Nkosi in relation to invoices and purchase orders from a city service provider.

    SABC News also reported that evidence showed Mnisi shared information with Nkosi relating to invoices from Gubis85 Solutions, a city service provider. Mnisi disputed that interpretation before the commission, creating a direct factual clash that investigators will need to resolve through documents, messages, and witness cross-examination.

    The allegations place personal relationships at the centre of a public procurement case. That matters because South African municipalities often rely on committees and controls to keep tender awards insulated from friendships, political influence, and informal channels. If the commission proves that a close relationship shaped decisions, it could damage confidence far beyond Tshwane.

    Municipal Discipline Widens

    SABC News reported on April 15, 2026, that Tshwane moved to start disciplinary proceedings against Mnisi after allegations of tender rigging and procurement irregularities. The city later placed him on precautionary suspension, a step that signals institutional concern while it examines the allegations further.

    That move matters because it shows the commission’s work now carries direct administrative consequences. Municipal leaders often suspend officials when they believe allegations may affect ongoing investigations, public trust, or the integrity of documents and witnesses. In this case, Tshwane has already signalled that it sees the allegations as serious enough to justify disciplinary action.

    EWN reported last week that the city gave Mnisi seven more days to explain why it should not suspend him, after his lawyers challenged the notice. That detail shows the dispute now runs across both the commission and the municipal labour process, where each step can affect the next.

    What The Commission Must Prove

    The legal threshold now matters as much as the political drama. To sustain any finding of corruption, maladministration, or procurement fraud, the commission must establish who knew what, when they knew it, and whether any official used their position to steer outcomes unlawfully.

    South Africa’s Public Finance Management framework and municipal procurement rules require transparent, documented, and competitive processes. The commission testimony, as reported by SABC News and EWN, suggests investigators are testing whether the TMPD-3 tender respected those rules or whether someone bent them for private advantage.

    The process also raises a basic fairness question. If bid evaluation committees recommended a contract only after the recommendation already existed, then the scoring exercise may have served as a formality rather than a genuine test of value and compliance. That interpretation remains an inference from the hearing reports, not a final finding.

    Political and Public Reaction

    Tshwane metro police chief Yolande Faro had already told the commission on April 7, 2026, that Nkosi had no authority to interfere in internal TMPD matters, according to EWN. That evidence matters because it challenges any attempt to portray Nkosi as a legitimate intermediary inside the department.

    The City of Tshwane has also tried to distance itself from corruption allegations more broadly. SABC News reported on March 19, 2026, that the mayor said the city would protect no one implicated in corruption. That stance gives the municipality a public anti-corruption position, even as the allegations now touch one of its senior finance officers.

    Mnisi, for his part, has kept denying the core accusation. EWN reported that he told the commission on Friday, April 18, 2026, that friendship with Nkosi did not translate into help with a tender. That denial now sits against documentary claims about messages, draft reports, and tender paperwork.

    Why Tshwane Matters Beyond Pretoria

    This case carries importance across southern and eastern Africa because municipal procurement problems often echo from one capital city to another. Nairobi, Harare, Lusaka, and Pretoria all face the same hard question: can public institutions keep tenders away from personal networks, police contacts, and political fixers?

    For investors and suppliers across South Africa, Botswana, Namibia, and Mozambique, the answer affects confidence in local government contracts. When procurement controls weaken in a capital city such as Tshwane, businesses start pricing in legal risk, delays, and possible cancellation of awards. That makes governance not just a political issue, but an economic one.

    The case also touches a wider African accountability trend. Commissions of inquiry in South Africa often become testing grounds for whether public institutions can expose patronage networks without collapsing under them. That question now extends to how municipalities handle security contracts, a sensitive sector across many African cities.

    What Happens Next

    The commission will continue testing the tender timeline, the missing documents, and the nature of Mnisi’s relationship with Nkosi. Investigators will likely compare testimony with emails, messages, reports, and committee records before they draw any conclusions.

    Tshwane now faces a crucial choice: it must either prove that its controls can survive scrutiny or accept that senior officials may have bent them. The next hearings will show whether this case ends as a personnel scandal, or whether it expands into one of the city’s most serious procurement crises in years.

    Sources:

    • SABC News, “TMPD tender recommendations came before bid scoring, commission hears,” April 2026.
    • SABC News, “Mnisi denies links to Malema related to Tshwane tender,” April 2026.
    • SABC News, “Mnisi questioned on Nkosi’s possession of tender report,” April 2026.
    • SABC News, “Tshwane to start disciplinary proceedings against suspended CFO,” April 2026.
    • EWN, “Madlanga Commission: Suspended Tshwane CFO Mnisi grilled over Sergeant Nkosi’s tender list,” April 2026.
    • EWN, “Tshwane’s suspended CFO Gareth Mnisi denied helping the brother of Sergeant Fannie Nkosi,” April 2026.
    • EWN, “Tshwane Metro Police chief says Nkosi had no authority to interfere in internal matters,” April 2026.
    • EWN, “Embattled Tshwane CFO afforded 7 more days to explain why he shouldn’t be suspended,” April 2026.
    • Sele Media Africa, related coverage, https://selemedia.org/

  • MultiChoice Warns Of Tough DStv Pricing Choices In 2026!

    Reported by Musa Antiketu, Journalist at Sele Media Africa.

    JOHANNESBURG, South Africa — MultiChoice Group has signalled a cautious DStv pricing stance as it heads into 2026, citing inflation, currency weakness and subscriber pressure across key African markets. The Johannesburg-based pay-TV company said its pricing approach must balance revenue protection with customer retention in markets where households face rising living costs.

    The company set out that position in its FY25 results materials and strategy updates, which show how macroeconomic pressure continues to shape its decisions. MultiChoice said inflation across its Rest of Africa footprint averaged about 20 percent, with Nigeria and Angola above 30 percent, while currency weakness cut reported revenues and trading profit.

    Pricing Under Pressure

    MultiChoice’s latest reporting shows the company still leans on inflationary pricing to offset subscriber losses and foreign-exchange shocks. The group said it applied average local-currency price increases of 31 percent across Rest of Africa in FY25, while South Africa saw a 5.7 percent increase.

    That approach now faces fresh scrutiny as subscribers in Nigeria, South Africa and Kenya continue to complain about repeated increases in the cost of premium TV access. MultiChoice’s own numbers show why the pressure persists: the company lost 1.2 million active linear subscribers in FY25, down 8 percent year on year, with declines split evenly between South Africa and Rest of Africa.

    The company linked those losses to a stretched consumer environment, power shortages in several markets and ongoing piracy. It also said revenue fell 9 percent to ZAR50.8 billion, while subscription revenues dropped 11 percent, partly because of currency weakness and lower volumes.

    Subscribers Push Back

    Consumer concern around DStv pricing has sharpened because household budgets across Africa have weakened under inflation and currency depreciation. MultiChoice said inflationary pressure hit its markets hard, especially Nigeria and Angola, where inflation exceeded 30 percent on a weighted-average basis, leaving fewer households able to absorb higher entertainment costs.

    The company has tried to soften the blow with new products and distribution changes. Its investor materials say it grew DStv Stream and DStv Internet, while also expanding Showmax and bundling options in select markets. MultiChoice frames those moves as part of a wider effort to retain customers without abandoning price discipline.

    Even so, the market signal remains clear: MultiChoice now faces a trade-off between maintaining margins and defending its subscriber base. The company said “inflationary pricing” helped it protect organic revenue, but it also acknowledged that subscriber volume pressure continues to weigh on the business.

    What The Numbers Show

    The numbers reveal a business under structural stress, not a short-term wobble. MultiChoice reported a ZAR5.2 billion revenue decline and a ZAR3.1 billion negative trading profit impact from currency movements alone in FY25.

    The company also said Rest of Africa active subscribers fell 7 percent year on year, with Nigeria accounting for more than half of that decline. It added that inflationary pricing delivered 3 percent organic revenue growth in Rest of Africa, but currency weakness still pushed reported revenues down 23 percent.

    That tension explains why MultiChoice sounds cautious about 2026 pricing. The group has not announced a universal new tariff schedule in the materials reviewed, but its strategy documents show that management expects inflation-linked pricing to remain central to its short-term plan.

    Competition Changes The Game

    MultiChoice also faces a broader shift in how Africans pay for video entertainment. The company says streaming, piracy and social media have changed viewing habits, while its own strategy now puts more weight on DStv Stream, Showmax and other digital offerings.

    That shift matters because premium pay-TV no longer enjoys the same pricing power it once had. Households in Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa can now compare satellite packages with cheaper internet-based alternatives, even where data costs remain high. MultiChoice appears to recognise that reality in its push to become “the streaming service of choice for all Africans,” while still preserving the core DStv business.

    The company’s latest results also show that new growth areas help, but not enough to erase the pressure on linear television. Showmax active paying subscribers rose 44 percent year on year, yet the group still recorded a sharp fall in overall subscription performance.

    Africa’s Pay-TV Fault Line

    MultiChoice’s pricing dilemma carries wider significance across the continent because it mirrors the strain on consumer-facing media businesses in inflation-hit markets. Nigeria, South Africa and Angola all face sharp currency or price pressures, and those conditions now shape what households can afford to watch, read and stream.

    The issue also speaks to broader debates about affordability and access in African media markets. In Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa, regulators and consumer advocates increasingly question whether essential entertainment and news platforms can raise prices faster than wages rise. MultiChoice’s results show the company trying to protect commercial sustainability while operating in economies where purchasing power has weakened.

    For Africa’s media ecosystem, the stakes extend beyond one company. If pay-TV prices climb too fast, more viewers may shift to free-to-air channels, mobile clips, social platforms or piracy, weakening the economics of original content across Nigeria, South Africa, Kenya and beyond.

    What Comes Next

    MultiChoice now enters 2026 with a clear but difficult mandate: defend revenue, slow subscriber losses and keep enough households inside the DStv ecosystem to justify its content spend. Its next results update will show whether management keeps leaning on inflation-linked pricing or softens its stance to protect volumes.

    Subscribers, regulators and competitors will all watch the next move closely. If MultiChoice raises prices too aggressively, it risks accelerating churn across Africa’s biggest pay-TV markets; if it holds back, it may absorb more pressure on margins and cash flow.

    Sources:

    • MultiChoice Group, FY25 annual results press release and results announcement, June 2025
    • MultiChoice Group, FY25 consolidated annual financial statements, June 2025
    • MultiChoice Group, strategy and latest results pages, accessed April 2026
    • Sele Media Africa, related past coverage if applicable, https://selemedia.org/

  • Unverified Malema Sentence Stirs Shock In South Africa

    Reported by Afilawos Magana Sur, Managing Editor | Journalist at Sele Media Africa.

    JOHANNESBURG, South Africa — An unverified report circulating in South African media says Economic Freedom Fighters leader Julius Malema has been sentenced to five years in prison over a firearm discharge case linked to a 2018 rally, a claim that has sparked immediate political and legal debate across the country. Sele Media Africa has not independently confirmed the judgment and treats the report as unverified.

    A Case That Has Long Carried Political Weight

    The allegation centres on a rally incident in which Malema was seen firing an assault rifle into the air. In South Africa, any firearm discharge in public can trigger serious legal consequences because the country’s laws place strict limits on public display and use of weapons. That is why any ruling in the case would carry both symbolic and legal weight.

    Supporters of Malema have often framed such moments as political theatre, while critics have argued that public leaders must not normalise firearm use at rallies. The reported sentence, if confirmed, would place the case at the centre of South Africa’s wider debate over political accountability and public safety.

    The timing matters because Malema remains one of South Africa’s most polarising opposition figures. Any prison sentence, especially one tied to conduct at a political rally, would likely ripple through the country’s legal and political landscape quickly.

    Why The Report Drew Attention

    The report spread fast because it touches a sensitive question: when does political symbolism become criminal conduct. In a country shaped by a long struggle over liberation, authority and state violence, the image of a political leader discharging a rifle in public carries heavy historical resonance.

    If the reported sentence proves accurate, it could sharpen tensions between Malema’s supporters and opponents. The EFF has built much of its public identity around defiance, confrontation and radical political language, so any criminal conviction tied to a rally act would likely become part of its broader political narrative.

    But until the court record confirms the sentence, the claim remains only an allegation. Sele Media Africa treats it as a developing and unverified report, not a confirmed legal outcome.

    What South African Law Would Test

    South Africa’s firearm laws impose strict rules on possession, handling and discharge of weapons. Courts generally weigh whether a public act created a safety risk, breached licensing rules or encouraged unlawful conduct. In a high-profile case like this, the legal test would not only concern the act itself but also the public context in which it happened.

    That is why this case would matter beyond one politician. If courts punish a senior opposition leader for publicly firing a weapon, the ruling would signal that political status does not shield public figures from ordinary criminal law.

    The reported sentence would also raise questions about how courts balance political expression against public safety. Supporters may argue that rallies allow symbolic gestures, but prosecutors and judges would focus on whether a firearm discharge exposed bystanders to danger.

    Why It Matters Across Southern Africa

    The reported case matters beyond South Africa because it touches a broader regional issue: the relationship between political power, public order and judicial independence. In many Southern African states, courts face pressure to show that they can apply the law to powerful figures without fear or favour.

    If the sentence is confirmed, it could become a reference point for opposition politics across the region. Politicians in neighbouring countries will watch closely because the ruling could influence how public displays of force or firearm symbolism are interpreted in law and politics.

    It also matters because South Africa remains a democratic bellwether in Africa. Any major judgment against a national opposition leader can shape confidence in institutions, the tone of election politics and public trust in the rule of law.

    What Happens Next

    The immediate next step is verification. A court judgment, legal filing or official statement would be necessary before this report can be treated as confirmed. Until then, the sentence remains an unverified claim with significant political implications.

    If confirmed, the ruling would likely trigger appeals, public rallies and strong reactions from the EFF, the prosecution and civil society. If it proves inaccurate, the episode will still highlight how quickly sensitive legal claims spread across the continent’s political information space.

    Sources:

    • Unverified media reports circulating in South Africa on Julius Malema’s alleged sentence.

  • South Africa’s History Curriculum Reform Sparks National Debate!

    Reported by Musa Antiketu, Journalist at Sele Media Africa.

    PRETORIA, South Africa — South Africa’s Basic Education Department has opened public comment on a draft history curriculum for Grades 4 to 12, triggering a national debate over decolonisation, academic balance, and how the country teaches its past. Basic Education Minister Siviwe Gwarube has urged calm and inclusive engagement as the consultation window runs until April 19, 2026. (gov.za)

    The draft curriculum puts greater emphasis on African perspectives, oral history, and previously marginalised narratives, while saying written sources, the colonial archive, and the apartheid record remain important and must face critical reading. Supporters call the reform overdue. Critics warn that political pressure could distort historical scholarship. (gov.za)

    Public Comment Window Opens

    The Department of Basic Education published the draft under Government Notice No. 7285 of March 20, 2026, and invited educators, historians, heritage institutions, civil society groups, parents, and the wider public to submit evidence-based comments. The notice covers CAPS documents for Grades 4 to 6, Grades 7 to 9, and Grades 10 to 12. (gov.za)

    Officials said the process aims to strengthen critical thinking, national identity, and social cohesion in a post-apartheid school system. The department also said the draft would expand the evidentiary base of history teaching by including oral history alongside written archives. (gov.za)

    The consultation period gives South Africans until April 19, 2026 to send comments. The department said it wants focused submissions tied to specific pages and documents, which suggests the ministry wants technical debate, not only political reaction. (gov.za)

    What The Draft Changes

    The department’s own summary says the new history proposal moves away from what it describes as parochial and Eurocentric framing. It places stronger weight on precolonial African history, global history, and the wider continent’s role in shaping South African identity. (education.gov.za)

    That shift matters because history teaching in South Africa has long carried the burden of the apartheid legacy. The curriculum debate now touches not only content, but also the kind of citizenship the school system wants to produce. (gov.za)

    In a country still marked by racial inequality, language tensions, and disputes over memory, the history classroom has become a battleground over national belonging. The draft therefore reaches far beyond textbooks and into the politics of identity. (gov.za)

    Critics Question Balance

    Some commentators have warned that a stronger focus on decolonisation can slide into selective storytelling if curriculum designers do not guard academic rigour. A City Press editorial in News24 said the revision needs careful design, proper teacher training, and balanced resources. (news24.com)

    The criticism does not reject African-centred teaching outright. Instead, it argues that reform must preserve evidence, complexity, and multiple historical perspectives, especially when schools carry the responsibility of shaping young citizens. (news24.com)

    That concern also echoes older debates inside South Africa’s education system. The Department itself has previously said a ministerial task team drafted a history curriculum after consultations with subject teachers, advisers, heritage institutions, and higher education experts across all nine provinces. (education.gov.za)

    Minister Urges Calm Dialogue

    Minister Gwarube has framed the process as one for engagement rather than confrontation. The department’s public notice invited “constructive” and evidence-based submissions, language that signals an effort to prevent the issue from collapsing into party-political theatre. (gov.za)

    That tone matters because curriculum fights in South Africa often spread quickly across unions, universities, parent groups, and social media. Once that happens, technical questions about pedagogy can turn into wider disputes over ideology and power. (gov.za)

    Gwarube’s appeal for calm also fits a broader government push to stabilise basic education through structured reform. In recent speeches, the department has linked curriculum reform to foundational learning, teacher support, and better classroom outcomes. (gov.za)

    Why History Still Matters

    South Africa does not debate history in a vacuum. The country’s school curriculum has long served as a site where public memory, racial justice, and state legitimacy collide. History teaching can either deepen civic understanding or harden social divisions, depending on how carefully reform unfolds. (gov.za)

    The department’s own documents show that it wants learners to study precolonial history, global history, and the contemporary state more systematically. It also wants pupils to examine race, gender, class, xenophobia, and genocide through the subject. (education.gov.za)

    That approach places South Africa alongside a wider international conversation about whose histories schools prioritise. But the South African case carries a sharper edge because the country still lives with the institutional afterlife of apartheid. (education.gov.za)

    Pan-African Significance

    The debate carries clear Pan-African significance because curriculum reform in South Africa often influences discussions in Kenya, Ghana, Nigeria, and Tanzania, where educators also weigh colonial archives against local knowledge systems. If Pretoria succeeds in building a rigorous African-centred model, other ministries may study it closely. (gov.za)

    That matters for governance across the continent. In many African states, school history still reflects colonial inheritances, and disputes over memory can shape elections, civic identity, and youth politics. South Africa’s process may therefore become a reference point for countries trying to rewrite syllabuses without sacrificing academic standards. (news24.com)

    It also matters for the diaspora and for African knowledge production. A curriculum that treats African archives, oral testimony, and regional history seriously can strengthen intellectual confidence in classrooms from Johannesburg to Accra and Nairobi, while also challenging older assumptions about whose knowledge counts. (gov.za)

    What Happens Next

    The department will now collect public submissions until April 19, 2026, after which officials will review the comments and decide whether to revise the draft before further institutional steps. The process may still change substantially if educators and historians file detailed objections or propose alternatives. (gov.za)

    Teachers, universities, heritage bodies, and political parties will likely keep pressing their views over the next week. The key test now rests on whether the ministry can keep the debate evidence-driven, because the final shape of the history curriculum will affect how a generation of South Africans learns the meaning of the past. (gov.za)

    Sources:

    • South African Government, Department of Basic Education media statement on public comments for draft history curriculum, March-April 2026
    • South African Government, National Education Policy Act notice on History Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statements, March 2026
    • Department of Basic Education, ministerial and curriculum documents on history reform, 2024-2026
    • News24, editorial on the proposed history curriculum, April 2026
    • Sele Media Africa, related coverage if applicable, https://selemedia.org/