Kanu’s Lawyers Condemn Rendition Justification, Cite Violation of Constitution!
Reported by Marian Opeyemi Fasesan | Sele Media Africa
The legal team representing Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), has rejected claims seeking to justify his 2021 rendition from Kenya using the legal doctrine of male captus bene detentus. The doctrine suggests that even if a suspect is unlawfully captured, their trial can still proceed.
Lawyers’ Position
- In a strongly worded statement, Kanu’s lawyers argued that the justification is both unconstitutional and a violation of international legal standards.
- They noted that Section 36 of Nigeria’s 1999 Constitution (as amended) guarantees fair hearing and due process, both of which were breached during Kanu’s transfer from Kenya.
- The legal team further insisted that the act constitutes extraordinary rendition, a practice condemned under international human rights conventions.
Background
- Kanu was forcibly returned to Nigeria in June 2021 after being apprehended in Kenya under murky circumstances, without extradition proceedings.
- The Nigerian government has defended the move, while human rights organizations and regional courts, including the ECOWAS Court, have raised concerns over its legality.
Why It Matters
- The issue continues to spark legal and diplomatic controversy, especially regarding Nigeria’s adherence to rule of law and international treaties.
- The lawyers have urged the court to dismiss the charges and release Kanu, arguing that the illegality of his arrest taints the entire prosecution.
Citations
- Premium Times – https://www.premiumtimesng.com
- Channels TV – https://www.channelstv.com
- Punch Nigeria – https://punchng.com
About The Author
Discover more from Sele Media Africa
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
