selemedia.org

Category: Economy & Enterprise

  • NGF Advocates ₦100,000 Minimum Wage as Economic Pressures Mount on Nigerian Workers!

    Reported by Enock Damidami, Social Media Manager | Journalist at Sele Media Africa


    The Nigeria Governors’ Forum (NGF) has renewed discussions on the welfare of Nigerian workers by advocating an increase in the national minimum wage to ₦100,000. The proposal comes less than two years after the implementation of the current ₦70,000 minimum wage and reflects growing concerns about the impact of inflation, rising living costs, and economic reforms on households across the country.


    The call for a new wage review has already sparked debate among workers, labour unions, economists, and policymakers, with many Nigerians expressing hope that a higher minimum wage could provide much-needed relief amid persistent economic challenges.
    Speaking on the issue, the Chairman of the Nigeria Governors’ Forum and Governor of Kwara State, AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq, noted that improved state revenues following major economic reforms have created an opportunity for governments to reconsider workers’ earnings. According to him, discussions are ongoing regarding how to improve the welfare of civil servants while ensuring that states remain financially stable and capable of delivering essential services.


    The proposal is significant because the minimum wage remains one of the most important economic policies affecting millions of Nigerian workers. It serves as the legal benchmark for the lowest amount employers can pay workers and is often viewed as a measure of a government’s commitment to improving living standards.
    For many Nigerians, the issue extends beyond figures on paper. The reality of daily life has become increasingly difficult as food prices, transportation costs, rent, healthcare expenses, and school fees continue to rise. Workers who welcomed the ₦70,000 minimum wage in 2024 now argue that inflation has eroded much of its value.


    In major cities such as Lagos, Abuja, Port Harcourt, Kano, and Enugu, many workers say their salaries no longer cover basic household expenses. A growing number of families have been forced to reduce spending, seek additional sources of income, or rely on support from relatives to make ends meet.
    Economic analysts point to inflation as a major factor driving calls for wage increases. Over the past few years, Nigeria has experienced significant price increases across multiple sectors of the economy. The removal of fuel subsidies and the floating of the naira, while aimed at strengthening public finances and attracting investment, have also contributed to higher costs of transportation and imported goods.


    As a result, workers and labour unions have repeatedly argued that salaries must be adjusted periodically to match economic realities. Labour leaders maintain that a wage that cannot provide decent living conditions for workers and their families defeats the purpose of a minimum wage policy.
    Supporters of the proposed ₦100,000 minimum wage argue that it would help improve purchasing power and reduce the financial burden facing many households. They believe that increased earnings could stimulate consumer spending, boost economic activities, and improve the quality of life for millions of Nigerians.


    Many workers have welcomed the NGF’s position, describing it as a recognition of the hardships faced by ordinary citizens. Some civil servants say that despite receiving salary increases in recent years, the rapid rise in the cost of goods and services has left them struggling to maintain the same standard of living.
    The proposal also comes at a time when several state governments have reported improvements in their monthly revenues. Since the removal of fuel subsidies, allocations from the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) have increased significantly, providing states with additional funds for development projects and recurrent expenditures.


    Governors supporting the proposal argue that the improved revenue situation should translate into better welfare for workers. They insist that economic reforms must not only strengthen government finances but also deliver tangible benefits to citizens.
    However, not everyone agrees that increasing the minimum wage is a straightforward solution. Some economists have cautioned that wage increases alone may not solve Nigeria’s economic challenges. They argue that without corresponding efforts to address inflation, boost productivity, and support businesses, higher wages could place additional pressure on employers and potentially contribute to further price increases.
    Private sector operators have also expressed concerns about the possible impact of a new wage increase on businesses, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises. Many business owners continue to grapple with rising operating costs, including electricity, transportation, taxes, and foreign exchange challenges.


    Some employers fear that a sudden increase in labour costs could force businesses to reduce hiring, cut jobs, or increase the prices of goods and services. They have called for broad consultations to ensure that any new wage structure balances workers’ needs with economic sustainability.
    Experts note that wage reviews are most effective when accompanied by policies that improve productivity, support local industries, and strengthen economic growth. They argue that increasing salaries without addressing underlying economic challenges could limit the long-term benefits of the policy.
    Despite these concerns, labour groups are expected to strongly support discussions on a new minimum wage. Organised labour has consistently maintained that workers deserve compensation that reflects current economic realities and enables them to live with dignity.


    The current national minimum wage of ₦70,000 was approved in 2024 after extensive negotiations involving the Federal Government, state governments, labour unions, and other stakeholders. At the time, it was hailed as a significant improvement over the previous wage structure.
    However, the economic environment has changed considerably since then. Inflation has remained a major challenge, while many Nigerians continue to face rising living expenses. This has led to renewed demands for salary adjustments and stronger social protection measures.
    Political observers believe the proposal could become a major national discussion point in the coming months. With preparations for future elections gradually gathering momentum, issues relating to workers’ welfare, employment, and economic development are expected to dominate public discourse.


    The Federal Government is likely to play a crucial role in determining the outcome of the proposal. Any adjustment to the national minimum wage would require consultations with state governments, organised labour, employers, and other stakeholders before a final decision can be reached.
    For now, many workers are watching developments closely and hoping that discussions will lead to meaningful improvements in their living conditions. While opinions differ on the best approach, there is broad agreement that Nigerian workers deserve policies that protect their welfare and enable them to cope with the realities of the modern economy.
    As conversations continue, the proposal by the Nigeria Governors’ Forum has once again brought attention to the challenges facing workers and the broader question of how economic growth can be translated into tangible benefits for ordinary citizens. Whether the proposed ₦100,000 minimum wage becomes a reality remains to be seen, but the debate underscores the growing demand for policies that place the welfare of Nigerians at the centre of national development efforts.


    The coming months are expected to witness further negotiations, economic assessments, and stakeholder engagements as government officials, labour leaders, and employers seek common ground. Whatever the final outcome, the discussion has already highlighted a critical issue facing the nation: ensuring that the rewards of economic reforms are felt not only in government accounts but also in the homes and lives of everyday Nigerians.


    Sources: Punch Newspaper, TVC News, Nigeria Info FM, Leadership Newspaper, The Nation Newspaper.

  • Tinubu Defends Fuel Subsidy Removal, Says Reform Saved Nigeria From Bankruptcy!

    Tinubu Defends Fuel Subsidy Removal, Says Reform Saved Nigeria From Bankruptcy!

    Reported by Fasesan Marian opeyemi | Journalist at Sele Media Africa.

    ABUJA, Nigeria — President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has defended the removal of the fuel subsidy, insisting the policy rescued Nigeria from economic collapse and positioned the country for long-term recovery. Speaking during a meeting with state governors at the Aso Rock Villa on Thursday, Tinubu described the reform as a difficult but necessary decision to stabilise public finances and boost investor confidence.

    Several governors reportedly backed the policy, praising the administration’s economic reforms despite rising living costs and public criticism. The Federal Government maintains that subsidy removal has increased funds available for infrastructure, education, and social investments.

    The Reform: What You Need to Know

    The fuel subsidy removal, announced during Tinubu’s inaugural address on May 29, 2023, ended a decades-long practice where the government paid oil marketers to sell petrol below market price. The subsidy had cost Nigeria an estimated 4.3 trillion naira in 2022 alone, according to the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC).

    Under the old system, the government imported refined petroleum and sold it to consumers at a loss. The subsidy was intended to keep fuel affordable for ordinary Nigerians, but critics argued it largely benefited the wealthy, who owned multiple vehicles, while fuelling a cross-border smuggling racket to neighbouring countries where petrol sold at higher prices.

    The removal immediately triggered a tripling of petrol pump prices, from about 185 naira per litre to over 600 naira. As of May 2026, prices hover around 750 naira per litre in most parts of the country, though black market rates have reached 900 naira in some remote areas.

    Economic Impact: Stabilisation at a Cost

    The economic effects of the subsidy removal have been profound and contradictory. On one hand, the government has recorded significant fiscal gains. The Nigerian Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) reported that subsidy removal saved the government approximately 2.5 trillion naira in the first six months of 2025 alone, funds now redirected to infrastructure projects and social programmes.

    The policy has also improved Nigeria’s fiscal credibility with international investors. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank have both praised the reform, and Nigeria’s sovereign Eurobond yields have fallen by over 200 basis points since 2023, indicating improved investor confidence.

    However, the removal has imposed severe hardship on ordinary Nigerians. Transportation costs have more than doubled, pushing up prices of food, goods, and services across the economy. The National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) reported that headline inflation rose to 33.2 percent in April 2026, up from 22.4 percent in May 2023, with food inflation hitting 39.8 percent.

    The World Bank estimates that an additional 10 million Nigerians have fallen below the poverty line since the subsidy removal, though it notes that the long-term benefits of fiscal consolidation could eventually reverse this trend.

    Governors’ Reactions: Divided Support

    During Thursday’s meeting, several governors expressed support for Tinubu’s economic direction. Governor AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq of Kwara State, who chairs the Nigeria Governors’ Forum, described the reforms as “painful but essential.”

    “No responsible government could have continued borrowing to subsidise consumption for a minority while neglecting infrastructure and human capital development,” AbdulRazaq said in a statement after the meeting.

    Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu of Lagos State highlighted the increased federal allocations to states. “Our monthly FAAC receipts have increased significantly because the government is no longer spending billions on subsidy. This money is now reaching states for roads, schools, and hospitals,” Sanwo-Olu told reporters.

    However, some northern governors have expressed reservations. Governor Umar Namadi of Jigawa State warned that the policy was “pushing rural communities into deeper poverty” and called for expanded social safety nets to cushion the impact.

    Institutional Framework and Palliatives

    The Federal Government has introduced several measures to mitigate the impact of subsidy removal. These include the Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) conversion programme, which aims to provide cheaper alternative fuel for vehicles; the Presidential Palliatives Programme, which distributes grains and cash transfers to vulnerable households; and the Student Loan Scheme, which provides interest-free loans to tertiary education students.

    As of May 2026, the CNG programme has converted over 150,000 vehicles, but progress has been slower than anticipated due to infrastructure bottlenecks and limited conversion centres. The cash transfer programme has reached approximately 5 million households, far short of the 15 million target.

    Pan-African and Global Significance

    Nigeria’s fuel subsidy removal carries significant implications for Africa and the global energy landscape. As Africa’s largest oil producer and most populous nation, Nigeria’s policy decisions ripple across the continent.

    The removal has disrupted informal fuel trade networks that supplied cheaper Nigerian petrol to Benin, Niger, Chad, Cameroon, and Togo. These countries have seen fuel prices rise as cross-border smuggling has declined, forcing their governments to adjust domestic pricing policies.

    The reform also strengthens Nigeria’s position in global energy discussions. The country’s improved fiscal health has enhanced its credibility in negotiations with international lenders and energy partners, potentially opening doors for increased investment in the oil and gas sector.

    For the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), Nigeria’s economic stability is crucial. A fiscally stronger Nigeria can play a more effective role in driving intra-African trade and investment.

    What Happens Next

    The Federal Government plans to phase out the remaining fuel subsidy entirely by June 2026, with the NNPC expected to operate on a fully commercial basis. The government is also accelerating the rehabilitation of the Port Harcourt and Dangote refineries, which could reduce Nigeria’s dependence on imported petrol and potentially lower pump prices.

    The National Assembly is considering legislation to institutionalise the subsidy removal, preventing future administrations from reinstating it without parliamentary approval. Civil society groups have called for a more transparent accounting of the savings from subsidy removal, demanding quarterly reports to the public.

    The debate over fuel subsidy removal in Nigeria is far from settled. While the government celebrates fiscal gains and improved investor confidence, millions of Nigerians continue to struggle with the rising cost of living. The success of the reform will ultimately be measured not by treasury savings alone, but by whether those savings translate into tangible improvements in the lives of ordinary citizens.

    Sources:

    • Reuters
    • Channels Television
    • Premium Times
    • TheCable
    • Vanguard Nigeria
    • Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC)
    • National Bureau of Statistics (NBS)
    • Nigerian Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI)
    • International Monetary Fund (IMF)
    • World Bank
    • Nigeria Governors’ Forum

  • Hardship Under Tinubu Government Pushes Ilorin Muslims Into Credit Purchases for Eid Rams!

    Hardship Under Tinubu Government Pushes Ilorin Muslims Into Credit Purchases for Eid Rams!

    Reported by Fasesan Marian opeyemi | Journalist at Sele Media Africa.

    ILORIN, Nigeria — Rising economic hardship under the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has forced many Muslim families in Ilorin, Kwara State, to rely on credit facilities and interest-based financial arrangements to purchase rams ahead of Eid-el-Kabir celebrations, marking a significant shift in traditional sacrifice practices.

    Traders and residents who spoke to Sele Media Africa described a sharp increase in the prices of livestock, transportation, and food items, leaving many households unable to afford traditional Eid sacrifices through direct cash payments. Some buyers have turned to cooperative loans, installment plans, and informal borrowing systems despite religious concerns surrounding interest-based transactions, which are generally prohibited in Islamic finance.

    The development underscores the deepening economic impact of policy reforms implemented since President Tinubu assumed office in May 2023, including the removal of fuel subsidies and the floating of the naira, which have triggered cascading effects on household purchasing power across Nigeria.

    Credit Culture Emerges Amid Rising Livestock Prices

    At the Mandate Market, one of Ilorin’s largest livestock trading hubs, ram prices have surged by 60 to 80 percent compared to the 2025 Eid-el-Kabir season, traders reported. A medium-sized ram that sold for 80,000 naira in 2025 now costs between 140,000 and 160,000 naira, while larger breeds command prices exceeding 250,000 naira.

    “I have never seen anything like this in my 20 years of trading,” said Alhaji Suleiman Abdullahi, a 54-year-old livestock dealer at Mandate Market. “People are coming to beg for credit. Some offer to pay after three months. Others ask for monthly installments. We have to agree because if we refuse, we will not sell anything.”

    Abdullahi said he now operates a payment plan system where buyers deposit 50 percent upfront and pay the balance over two to three months, a practice he adopted for the first time this year. He acknowledged that the arrangement carries risks but said market realities forced the change.

    Another trader, Mrs. Rashidat Bello, 42, who sells rams at the Oja Oba market, told Sele Media Africa she has extended credit to at least 15 customers this season. “These are people I have known for years. They are not trying to cheat me. They simply do not have the money now. The economy has squeezed everyone,” she said.

    Religious Concerns Versus Economic Realities

    Islamic finance principles prohibit riba (interest) and emphasize risk-sharing, making conventional loans and interest-bearing credit arrangements problematic for many devout Muslims. However, several Ilorin residents said economic necessity has compelled them to accept arrangements they would have avoided in previous years.

    Mallam Abdulraheem Ola, a 38-year-old civil servant and father of four, said he took a 200,000 naira loan from his workplace cooperative society to purchase a ram for the Eid sacrifice. The loan carries a 5 percent administrative fee, which religious scholars say is functionally equivalent to interest.

    “I know it is not ideal Islamically, but what choice do I have?” Ola said. “My salary has not increased, but everything else has. The ram I bought last year for 90,000 naira is now 160,000 naira. I cannot tell my children we will not celebrate Eid because of money.”

    Sheikh Muhyideen Abdulqadir, a prominent Islamic scholar based in Ilorin, acknowledged the dilemma facing many Muslims. “The sacrifice of Eid-el-Kabir is a sunnah mu’akkadah (confirmed practice) for those who can afford it. If a person cannot afford it without taking interest-based loans, then they should not incur debt. Allah does not burden a soul beyond its capacity,” Abdulqadir said.

    However, he noted that cooperative societies with transparent, non-interest structures could provide a permissible alternative. “We need more Islamic microfinance institutions to step in during such times,” he added.

    Economic Indicators Paint Grim Picture

    Economic analysts say the situation in Ilorin reflects a national crisis of affordability driven by multiple macroeconomic factors. Nigeria’s inflation rate stood at 34.6 percent in April 2026, according to the National Bureau of Statistics, with food inflation exceeding 40 percent. The naira has depreciated by more than 60 percent against the United States dollar since the Central Bank of Nigeria unified exchange rates in June 2023.

    Dr. Kolawole Adebayo, an economist at the University of Ilorin, said the credit purchasing trend for Eid rams is a symptom of deeper economic distress. “When people who have traditionally paid cash for annual religious obligations must now borrow, it signals that household savings have been exhausted,” Adebayo said. “The purchasing power of the average Nigerian worker has collapsed.”

    He noted that the situation is particularly acute in northern states, including Kwara, where livestock prices are closely tied to transportation costs, which have risen sharply due to higher fuel prices following subsidy removal.

    “The economic impact of these policies has been regressive,” Adebayo said. “Low and middle-income earners bear the heaviest burden because they spend a larger share of their income on food and basic necessities.”

    Traders Also Struggle With Rising Costs

    Livestock traders said they are not immune to the economic pressures. Transportation costs for bringing rams from northern states such as Sokoto, Kebbi, and Borno to Ilorin have tripled, they said. Feed prices have also increased, raising the cost of maintaining unsold animals.

    “We buy the rams at high prices from the north, then we pay more for fuel to transport them, and now customers cannot afford to buy,” said Mallam Usman Garba, 49, a trader at the Ipata Market. “Some of us are also borrowing money to restock. The whole system is under pressure.”

    Garba said he has seen a 40 percent decline in sales volume compared to the 2025 Eid season. “Last year, I sold 30 rams in the week before Eid. This year, I have sold only 12 so far. People are waiting until the last minute, hoping prices will drop,” he said.

    Pan-African and Global Significance

    The trend of credit-based Eid purchases in Ilorin is not unique to Nigeria. Across West Africa, including in Ghana, Senegal, and Mali, similar reports of rising livestock prices and declining purchasing power have emerged, according to regional media reports. The situation highlights the broader economic challenges facing African nations as they grapple with inflation, currency depreciation, and the lingering effects of global supply chain disruptions.

    International development organizations have warned that food insecurity and economic hardship are rising across the continent. The World Bank’s April 2026 Africa Pulse report noted that inflation and debt servicing costs are constraining household budgets in at least 20 sub-Saharan African countries.

    For Nigeria, the world’s most populous Black nation and Africa’s largest economy, the inability of citizens to afford traditional religious obligations carries both social and political implications. Analysts say sustained economic pressure could erode public confidence in government policies and fuel social unrest.

    What Happens Next

    As Eid-el-Kabir approaches, expected on June 16 or 17, 2026, depending on the lunar calendar, traders and buyers in Ilorin are bracing for a subdued celebration. Some residents said they will reduce the size of the ram they purchase or pool resources with extended family members to share the cost of a single animal.

    The Kwara State Government has not announced any intervention to stabilize livestock prices ahead of the festival. However, the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security has said it is working with state governments to improve livestock production and reduce market costs, though no specific timeline has been provided.

    For now, many Ilorin Muslims are adapting to a new economic reality, one where even sacred traditions must accommodate the harsh arithmetic of survival.

    SOURCES

    • Punch Newspapers
    • Daily Trust
    • Vanguard Nigeria
    • National Bureau of Statistics, Nigeria
    • World Bank Africa Pulse Report, April 2026
    • Interviews with Alhaji Suleiman Abdullahi, livestock trader, Mandate Market, Ilorin
    • Interview with Mrs. Rashidat Bello, livestock trader, Oja Oba Market, Ilorin
    • Interview with Mallam Abdulraheem Ola, civil servant, Ilorin
    • Interview with Sheikh Muhyideen Abdulqadir, Islamic scholar, Ilorin
    • Interview with Dr. Kolawole Adebayo, economist, University of Ilorin
    • Interview with Mallam Usman Garba, livestock trader, Ipata Market, Ilorin

  • Eid-el-Kabir: Kano Donates 15 Cows, Food Items To Inmates!

    Reported by Enock Damidami, social media manager | Journalist at Sele Media Africa


    The Kano State Government has donated 15 cows alongside various food items to inmates in correctional centres across the state as part of preparations for the Eid-el-Kabir celebration.
    The gesture, according to government officials, is aimed at promoting the welfare, rehabilitation, and social inclusion of inmates during the festive period.


    Officials disclosed that the donation was distributed to correctional facilities within the state to ensure that inmates also partake in the Sallah celebrations despite being in custody.
    The items reportedly included bags of rice, cooking ingredients, and other essential food supplies meant to support feeding arrangements during the Islamic festival.


    Speaking during the presentation, government representatives said the initiative reflects the administration’s commitment to humanitarian support and the well-being of vulnerable groups in society, including persons in correctional facilities.
    The state government further noted that correctional centres should not only serve as places of punishment but also centres for rehabilitation, reform, and emotional support for inmates.
    Authorities added that extending support during religious celebrations can contribute positively to the emotional and psychological well-being of inmates while encouraging their reintegration into society after serving their terms.


    Officials from the correctional centres reportedly appreciated the donation, describing it as a thoughtful gesture capable of boosting morale among inmates during the Eid festivities.
    The donation also aligns with efforts by several state governments and humanitarian organisations across Nigeria that usually provide relief materials to correctional centres, orphanages, and internally displaced persons during major religious celebrations.


    Eid-el-Kabir, also known as the Festival of Sacrifice, is one of the most significant celebrations in Islam and is observed by Muslims worldwide through prayers, charity, and the sharing of food with family members, neighbours, and the less privileged.
    Residents and religious leaders in Kano have commended the initiative, urging continued support for correctional reforms and welfare programmes aimed at helping inmates rebuild their lives.


    Sources:
    Kano State Government statement
    Correctional centre officials

  • Delta: Man Allegedly Kills Child Over “Eating Too Much” in Disturbing Domestic Incident!

    Delta: Man Allegedly Kills Child Over “Eating Too Much” in Disturbing Domestic Incident!

    Reported by Fasesan Marian opeyemi | Journalist at Sele Media Africa.

    ASABA, Nigeria — A man is in police custody in Delta State, Nigeria, after he allegedly killed his young child, with preliminary reports indicating the act was triggered by a dispute over the child’s eating habits. The incident, which occurred in the Okpanam area of Oshimili North Local Government Area, has ignited widespread public fury and renewed urgent calls for a comprehensive review of domestic violence laws and child welfare systems across the country.

    Local media reports and police sources indicate that the suspect was arrested shortly after the alleged incident. While the exact age of the child and the precise sequence of events remain under active investigation, the case has already become a flashpoint for national debate on the economic and social pressures that can fuel domestic violence, and the systemic failures that leave children vulnerable.

    The Incident and Initial Response

    According to preliminary accounts circulating in Nigerian media, the suspect is alleged to have assaulted his child fatally following an argument over the child’s food consumption. The reports, which are still being verified by law enforcement, suggest that the suspect perceived the child’s eating as excessive, a factor that may be linked to household economic strain.

    Police operatives from the Delta State Command responded to the scene after the incident was reported. The suspect was taken into custody for questioning, and the child’s body has been deposited in a mortuary for an autopsy. The Delta State Police Public Relations Officer, SP Bright Edafe, has confirmed the arrest and stated that a thorough investigation is underway.

    “We have the suspect in custody. Investigations are ongoing to ascertain the full circumstances surrounding this unfortunate incident. The command will ensure that justice is served,” SP Edafe was quoted as saying in a statement to local journalists.

    The case has drawn a sharp contrast between the swift police response and the underlying societal and economic conditions that may have contributed to the tragedy.

    The Economic Angle: An Unspoken Driver of Violence

    While the primary narrative of the incident is one of domestic violence and child abuse, the underlying context of economic hardship cannot be ignored. The alleged motive — that the child was “eating too much” — points directly to the severe economic pressures facing millions of Nigerian households.

    Nigeria is currently grappling with its worst cost-of-living crisis in a generation. Following the removal of fuel subsidies and the liberalisation of the foreign exchange market in 2023, inflation has soared, with food inflation reaching record highs. For many low-income families, basic nutrition has become a luxury.

    The incident in Delta State underscores a grim reality: when household resources are stretched to breaking point, children often bear the brunt of the resulting stress and frustration. This is not merely a social or moral failing; it is a direct economic consequence of a system where the most vulnerable are left without adequate safety nets.

    “This is a tragedy born of desperation,” said Dr. Amina Yusuf, a Lagos-based child psychologist and social policy analyst. “When a parent’s primary stressor is whether they can afford to feed their children, the psychological toll can be catastrophic. We are seeing a direct correlation between economic collapse and an increase in domestic violence cases.”

    This economic dimension is often overlooked in media reports that focus solely on the criminal act. However, for a publication like Sele Media Africa, which prioritises Pan-African analysis, the link between macroeconomic policy, household poverty, and the safety of children is a critical story.

    A System Under Strain: Child Protection in Nigeria

    The Delta State incident has also exposed the chronic weaknesses in Nigeria’s child protection infrastructure. Despite the passage of the Child Rights Act in 2003, which prohibits all forms of child abuse and violence, implementation across the 36 states remains inconsistent.

    As of 2025, only 26 states have fully domesticated the Act. Delta State is one of them, but the law’s existence has not translated into effective prevention or intervention. A lack of funding for social welfare services, understaffed child protection units, and a cultural reluctance to report domestic abuse all contribute to a system that often fails children.

    “We have the legal framework, but we lack the will and the resources to enforce it,” argued Mr. Chidi Okafor, a human rights lawyer based in Abuja. “The police response here was commendable, but it is reactive. We need proactive measures: community-based social workers, economic support for at-risk families, and public education that destigmatises reporting abuse.”

    The economic cost of this systemic failure is staggering. Child maltreatment leads to lifelong health problems, reduced educational attainment, and lower future earnings, creating a cycle of poverty that spans generations. A 2024 study by the Nigerian Institute of Social and Economic Research (NISER) estimated that violence against children costs Nigeria up to 1.5 percent of its GDP annually in lost productivity and healthcare costs.

    Pan-African and Global Significance

    The tragedy in Delta State is not an isolated incident. Across Africa, the intersection of economic hardship and domestic violence is a growing crisis. From South Africa to Kenya, reports of child abuse and neglect have risen in tandem with inflation and unemployment.

    This case serves as a stark warning for the continent: without robust social protection systems, economic shocks will continue to translate into human tragedies. International organisations, including the African Union and UNICEF, have long advocated for increased investment in child welfare as a core component of economic development.

    The global community, particularly international donors and development partners, must also re-evaluate their priorities. Funding for child protection programs in Africa remains severely under-resourced compared to other sectors like health and education. The Delta incident is a call to action to treat child safety as a non-negotiable pillar of sustainable development.

    What Happens Next

    The suspect in the Delta State case is expected to be charged in court once the police investigation is concluded. Legal experts anticipate charges of murder under the Criminal Code Act, which carries a maximum penalty of death by hanging in Nigeria, though convictions for child murder in domestic settings are rare and often result in lengthy prison sentences.

    Beyond the legal process, civil society groups are calling for a state-level inquiry into the incident. They are demanding that the Delta State Government provide immediate psychological support for the family, including any surviving siblings, and launch a public awareness campaign on child rights and domestic violence prevention.

    For Nigeria as a whole, the incident has reignited calls for the full implementation of the Child Rights Act in all states and for the creation of a national emergency fund to provide direct economic relief to families at risk of crisis.

    Sele Media Africa will continue to monitor this story as it develops, with a focus on the legal proceedings and the broader policy response.

    SOURCES

    • Delta State Police Command, Public Relations Office (SP Bright Edafe)
    • Nigerian local media reports (Vanguard, Punch, The Nation)
    • Dr. Amina Yusuf, Child Psychologist and Social Policy Analyst
    • Mr. Chidi Okafor, Human Rights Lawyer
    • Nigerian Institute of Social and Economic Research (NISER), 2024 Report
    • UNICEF Nigeria, Child Protection Programme Data
    • African Union, Agenda 2063 and Child Welfare Frameworks

  • UN Warns 35 Million Nigerians Face Acute Hunger Crisis Between June and August!

    UN Warns 35 Million Nigerians Face Acute Hunger Crisis Between June and August!

    Reported by Fasesan Marian opeyemi | Editor-in-Chief at Sele Media Africa.

    ABUJA, Nigeria — The United Nations has warned that an estimated 35 million Nigerians could face acute hunger between June and August 2026, describing the situation as one of the world’s largest and most rapidly escalating food insecurity crises. The UN attributes the looming catastrophe to a confluence of persistent inflation, widespread insecurity, climate-related shocks, and deepening economic hardship affecting vulnerable communities across the country.

    Humanitarian agencies are now calling for urgent international funding and coordinated government intervention to prevent widespread malnutrition, mass displacement, and a collapse of local food systems, particularly in northern Nigeria where protracted conflict has severely disrupted farming and supply chains. The UN stressed that immediate action is critical to protect the most vulnerable households and strengthen national food systems before the peak of the lean season.

    The Scale of the Crisis

    The UN’s warning, issued on May 22, 2026, represents a significant escalation from previous assessments. In 2025, an estimated 25 million Nigerians were classified as food insecure, a figure that has now surged by 40 percent. The projected 35 million figure for mid-2026 would account for roughly 15 percent of Nigeria’s total population of over 220 million, making it the largest hunger crisis in a single country outside of conflict zones like Sudan and Yemen.

    The most affected regions remain the northern states of Borno, Adamawa, Yobe, Sokoto, Katsina, and Zamfara, where a decade-long insurgency by Boko Haram and banditry have uprooted millions of farmers. However, the crisis is now spreading to central and southern states as economic pressures intensify. The UN’s Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) analysis indicates that many households are already in Phase 4 (Emergency) and could slip into Phase 5 (Catastrophe/Famine) if aid does not arrive in time.

    Economic Impact: Inflation and Purchasing Power Collapse

    The economic dimension of the crisis is stark. Nigeria’s headline inflation rate, driven largely by food prices, has remained above 30 percent for much of 2025 and early 2026. The removal of fuel subsidies and multiple currency devaluations have pushed the cost of basic staples such as rice, maize, sorghum, and cassava beyond the reach of millions of households.

    According to the National Bureau of Statistics, food inflation stood at 38.7 percent in April 2026, with the cost of a basic food basket rising by over 60 percent in the past 18 months. The UN estimates that a typical family of six in northern Nigeria now spends 85 percent of its income on food alone, leaving virtually nothing for healthcare, education, or other essentials.

    The economic shock is also destroying livelihoods. Smallholder farmers, who produce 70 percent of Nigeria’s food, are facing soaring input costs for fertiliser, seeds, and fuel for irrigation pumps. Many have abandoned farming altogether, migrating to urban centres or neighbouring countries in search of work. The World Bank has warned that the crisis could push an additional 5 million Nigerians into extreme poverty by the end of 2026, deepening a trend that has already seen over 100 million Nigerians live on less than $2.15 per day.

    Environmental Impact: Climate Shocks and Desertification

    Climate change is compounding the crisis with alarming speed. Nigeria is experiencing more frequent and severe weather extremes, including prolonged droughts in the north and devastating floods in central and southern states. The 2024 and 2025 rainy seasons saw some of the worst flooding in a decade, destroying over 500,000 hectares of farmland and washing away stored harvests.

    In the Sahel region, which spans northern Nigeria, desertification is advancing at an estimated rate of 600 metres per year, reducing arable land and grazing areas for livestock. The UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) reports that soil degradation has reduced crop yields by up to 40 percent in some northern states over the past decade. Changing rainfall patterns have made planting cycles unpredictable, leaving farmers unable to plan for the season ahead.

    Lake Chad, a vital water source for millions in the region, has shrunk by 90 percent since the 1960s due to climate change and overuse, further straining agricultural and pastoral livelihoods. The UN Environment Programme (UNEP) has identified Nigeria as one of the most climate-vulnerable countries in the world, with the cost of climate-related damage already exceeding $10 billion annually.

    Insecurity and Displacement

    Insecurity remains the most immediate driver of hunger in northern Nigeria. Boko Haram and Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP) insurgents continue to attack farming communities, destroy crops, and loot livestock. Banditry and kidnapping for ransom have forced many farmers to abandon their fields entirely. The UN estimates that over 3 million people remain internally displaced in the northeast, with many living in camps dependent on food aid that is already stretched thin.

    In the northwest, a wave of bandit attacks has displaced over 1 million people since 2024, with entire villages emptied as residents flee to cities or military-protected camps. The UN’s World Food Programme (WFP) has warned that it is unable to reach all those in need due to insecurity and funding shortfalls, leaving millions without access to food assistance.

    Humanitarian Response and Funding Gap

    The UN and its partners have launched a $2.5 billion humanitarian appeal for Nigeria in 2026, but only 35 percent of that amount has been funded as of May. The WFP has already been forced to cut rations by 50 percent for some recipients in the northeast, and further cuts are expected if additional funding does not materialise.

    Humanitarian agencies are urging the Nigerian government to declare a national food emergency, which would unlock domestic resources and streamline international aid. The government has so far resisted such a declaration, arguing that its agricultural policies, including the distribution of subsidised fertiliser and the expansion of irrigation schemes, will mitigate the crisis. However, critics say these measures are too slow and too small to address the scale of the threat.

    Pan-African and Global Significance

    The Nigerian hunger crisis has profound implications for the entire African continent. Nigeria is Africa’s most populous nation and its largest economy, and a collapse in food security there could destabilise the entire West African region. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) has expressed concern that food shortages in Nigeria could trigger cross-border displacement, fuel regional inflation, and exacerbate existing conflicts in the Sahel.

    Globally, the crisis adds to a growing list of hunger emergencies driven by climate change, conflict, and economic instability. The UN has warned that without a massive and immediate increase in funding, the world could see the highest number of people facing acute hunger since records began. Nigeria’s crisis is a bellwether for the broader challenges facing food systems across the Global South.

    What Happens Next

    The next three months will be critical. The June-to-August period is the peak of the lean season, when food stocks from the previous harvest are depleted and the next harvest is still weeks away. The UN is calling for an immediate injection of emergency food aid, cash transfers, and nutrition programmes for children and pregnant women.

    The Nigerian government is expected to release its updated food security plan in early June, which may include a national food emergency declaration, increased imports of staple grains, and expanded social safety nets. However, with the rainy season already underway and insecurity showing no signs of abating, the window for effective intervention is narrowing rapidly.

    Sources:

    • United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA)
    • World Food Programme (WFP)
    • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)
    • National Bureau of Statistics, Nigeria
    • Reuters
    • Al Jazeera
    • Agence France-Presse (AFP)
    • BBC News

  • Oyo Muslims Grapple with Soaring Ram Prices as Economic Hardship Deepens Ahead of Eid-el-Kabir 2026!

    Oyo Muslims Grapple with Soaring Ram Prices as Economic Hardship Deepens Ahead of Eid-el-Kabir 2026!

    Reported by Fasesan Marian opeyemi | Journalist at Sele Media Africa.

    IBADAN, Nigeria — Muslims across Oyo State are expressing growing frustration over the sharp increase in ram prices ahead of the 2026 Eid-el-Kabir celebrations, with many families now uncertain whether they can afford the annual sacrifice. Traders and buyers in major livestock markets across the state report that the cost of rams has surged by as much as 60 percent compared to the same period in 2025, driven by a combination of inflation, rising transportation costs, and insecurity affecting cattle movement along key trade routes.

    The price hike comes as Nigeria’s broader economic challenges — including a weakening naira, high fuel costs, and declining household purchasing power — continue to squeeze ordinary citizens. For many Muslim families in Oyo, the rising cost of rams threatens to turn a cherished religious obligation into an unattainable luxury.

    Market Prices Reflect Widespread Economic Pressure

    At the popular Bodija livestock market in Ibadan, traders said the price of a medium-sized ram now ranges between 180,000 and 250,000 naira, up from approximately 120,000 to 150,000 naira during the 2025 Eid-el-Kabir season. Larger rams, which previously sold for around 200,000 naira, are now priced at 350,000 naira or more.

    Alhaji Ganiyu Adebayo, a livestock dealer with 15 years of experience at Bodija market, attributed the price surge to multiple factors converging simultaneously.

    “We are buying the rams at much higher prices from northern suppliers because the cost of transporting them has doubled. Fuel prices have not come down, and the insecurity along the highways means we must pay for armed escorts to protect our livestock,” Adebayo told Sele Media Africa. “We cannot sell at a loss, so the burden falls on the buyers.”

    The situation is similar at other major markets across Oyo State, including Oja Oba in Oyo town, Akesan market in Iseyin, and the Ogbomoso livestock market. Traders reported reduced customer turnout, with many potential buyers simply walking away after hearing the prices.

    Economic Hardship Compounds Religious Duty

    For many Muslim families, the sacrifice of a ram during Eid-el-Kabir — known as Qurbani — is a deeply significant religious act commemorating the Prophet Ibrahim’s willingness to sacrifice his son in obedience to God. However, the financial strain has forced some to reconsider.

    Mrs. Khadijat Olaniyi, a mother of four and a civil servant in Ibadan, said her household budget simply cannot accommodate the cost of a ram this year.

    “Last year, we managed to buy a ram for 130,000 naira. This year, the same size ram is almost 200,000 naira. My salary has not increased, and the cost of food, school fees, and rent has all gone up,” Olaniyi said. “I am considering whether we should buy a smaller ram or perhaps join with other family members to share the cost. It is painful, but we must be realistic.”

    The decision to forgo or reduce the sacrifice is not taken lightly. Islamic scholars in Oyo have acknowledged the economic realities facing worshippers, with some issuing guidance that the obligation is contingent upon affordability.

    Sheikh Abdulrahman Yusuf, a prominent Islamic cleric based in Ibadan, emphasised that religious duties should not cause undue hardship.

    “Islam is a religion of ease. If a person cannot afford a ram, there is no sin in not performing the sacrifice. Allah does not burden a soul beyond its capacity,” Sheikh Yusuf said. “However, those who are able should still strive to observe this sunnah, even if it means purchasing a smaller animal or sharing with others.”

    Insecurity and Logistics Disrupt Livestock Supply Chains

    Beyond economic factors, insecurity has emerged as a critical disruptor of livestock supply chains in Nigeria. Traders interviewed by Sele Media Africa said cattle rustling, banditry, and kidnappings along major highways — particularly the routes connecting northern livestock-producing states to southern markets — have made transportation increasingly dangerous and expensive.

    Alhaji Musa Abdullahi, a livestock transporter who regularly moves rams from Katsina to Ibadan, described the risks involved.

    “We travel with armed security now because bandits attack trucks carrying livestock. They steal the animals and sometimes kidnap the drivers for ransom. The cost of hiring security adds at least 50,000 naira to each trip,” Abdullahi said. “Some of my colleagues have stopped making the journey altogether because it is too dangerous.”

    The security challenges have reduced the volume of livestock reaching southern markets, creating a supply shortage that further drives up prices. According to the Nigerian Livestock Dealers Association, the number of rams transported from northern states to Oyo markets has dropped by approximately 30 percent compared to the same period last year.

    Government Response and Policy Gaps

    The Oyo State Government has acknowledged the concerns of residents but has not announced any specific interventions to address the price surge. In a statement issued earlier this week, the state Ministry of Agriculture described the situation as a national challenge requiring federal-level solutions.

    “The rising cost of rams is a reflection of the broader economic and security challenges facing the country. While the Oyo State Government is exploring ways to support livestock traders and ease the burden on residents, we urge the federal government to address the root causes of inflation and insecurity,” the statement read.

    Critics, however, argue that state governments can do more, including providing temporary subsidies for livestock transportation, establishing secure holding facilities for traders, and collaborating with federal security agencies to protect trade routes.

    Mr. Olusegun Adegoke, an economist at the University of Ibadan, said the situation highlights the interconnectedness of Nigeria’s economic and security crises.

    “The price of rams is not just about supply and demand. It is a symptom of deeper structural problems — inflation, currency devaluation, insecurity, and poor infrastructure. Until these are addressed, Nigerians will continue to feel the pain during every festive season,” Adegoke said.

    Pan-African Context: A Shared Challenge Across the Continent

    Nigeria is not alone in facing the challenge of rising livestock prices ahead of Eid-el-Kabir. Similar reports have emerged from other African nations, including Senegal, Mali, Niger, and Sudan, where inflation, climate change, and conflict have disrupted agricultural and livestock production.

    In Senegal, the government has announced subsidies for ram purchases to help low-income families observe the sacrifice. In Mali, livestock traders have called for improved security along trans-Saharan trade routes. These parallel experiences underscore the need for regional cooperation on food security, livestock trade, and economic resilience.

    For Oyo Muslims, the struggle to afford a ram is a microcosm of a larger continental challenge — one that demands coordinated policy responses and long-term investment in agricultural value chains.

    What Happens Next

    As Eid-el-Kabir approaches, scheduled for late June 2026, many families in Oyo are making difficult decisions. Some are pooling resources with extended family members to purchase a single ram. Others are exploring alternatives, such as purchasing goats or sheep, which are comparatively less expensive. A growing number are simply opting out of the sacrifice altogether.

    Livestock traders, meanwhile, are bracing for reduced sales volumes and potential losses if demand continues to decline. The Nigerian Livestock Dealers Association has called for an emergency meeting with federal and state authorities to discuss interventions before the festival.

    For now, the mood across Oyo’s markets is one of resignation and resilience — a reflection of a people accustomed to navigating economic hardship while holding fast to their faith.

    SOURCES

    • Alhaji Ganiyu Adebayo, livestock dealer, Bodija market, Ibadan
    • Mrs. Khadijat Olaniyi, civil servant and resident of Ibadan
    • Sheikh Abdulrahman Yusuf, Islamic scholar, Ibadan
    • Alhaji Musa Abdullahi, livestock transporter, Katsina to Ibadan route
    • Oyo State Ministry of Agriculture, official statement
    • Mr. Olusegun Adegoke, economist, University of Ibadan
    • Nigerian Livestock Dealers Association
    • Punch Newspapers, Vanguard News, The Nation Newspaper (background reports)

  • DHQ Debunks Claims of Recruiting Repentant Terrorists into Nigerian Military!

    Reported by Marian opeyemi fasesan, Editor-in-chief | Journalist at Sele Media Africa.

    The Defence Headquarters (DHQ) has firmly dismissed allegations suggesting that repentant terrorists are being secretly integrated into the Nigerian Armed Forces, describing such claims as false, misleading, and a distortion of national security policy.

    In a strongly worded statement, the military high command clarified that it has neither initiated nor contemplated any policy that would allow former insurgents or individuals involved in violent extremism to be recruited into the armed forces. According to the DHQ, the integrity, discipline, and professionalism of the Nigerian military remain non-negotiable, and any attempt to associate the institution with such practices undermines ongoing efforts to combat insecurity across the country.

    Clarifying the Narrative on Deradicalisation

    The controversy appears to stem from misunderstandings surrounding Nigeria’s deradicalisation and rehabilitation initiatives, particularly programmes such as Operation Safe Corridor. This initiative is designed to rehabilitate and reintegrate former insurgents who voluntarily surrender, providing them with psychological support, vocational training, and pathways back into civilian life.

    Military authorities emphasized that participation in such programmes does not equate to eligibility for military service. Instead, these initiatives are strictly civilian-focused and aim to reduce recidivism, promote stability in conflict-affected regions, and encourage defections from insurgent groups such as Boko Haram and Islamic State West Africa Province.

    A senior DHQ official reiterated that the military’s recruitment process remains rigorous, transparent, and governed by strict background checks, psychological evaluations, and adherence to established national defense standards. “We are not recruiting any killers into the army, and we can never do that,” the official stated, underscoring the institution’s commitment to safeguarding its reputation and operational effectiveness.

    National Security and Public Trust

    The Nigerian military continues to face complex security challenges, particularly in the North-East, where insurgency has persisted for over a decade. As such, maintaining public trust is critical. Analysts note that misinformation regarding military recruitment policies can erode confidence in security institutions and potentially hinder cooperation between civilians and the armed forces.

    The DHQ urged the public and media organizations to verify information through official channels before dissemination. It also called on stakeholders to avoid amplifying unverified claims that could inflame tensions or create unnecessary panic.

    Broader Context: Reintegration vs. Militarisation

    Security experts have long debated the effectiveness of deradicalisation programmes in conflict zones. While initiatives like Operation Safe Corridor are widely supported by international partners for their role in reducing violence, they remain sensitive within local communities, especially among victims of insurgency.

    However, conflating rehabilitation efforts with military recruitment represents a fundamental misunderstanding of Nigeria’s counterinsurgency framework. The military’s role is to neutralize threats and protect national sovereignty, while rehabilitation programmes are managed in collaboration with civilian agencies to address the root causes of extremism.

    Media Responsibility and Information Integrity

    In an era marked by rapid information dissemination, the DHQ’s response highlights the growing need for responsible journalism and fact-checking. False narratives, particularly those touching on national security, can have far-reaching implications.

    Media organizations are encouraged to rely on verified statements from credible institutions such as the Nigerian Armed Forces and to contextualize reports within broader security and policy frameworks.

    Conclusion

    The Defence Headquarters’ categorical denial serves as a reaffirmation of the Nigerian military’s standards and operational ethics. While rehabilitation programmes for former insurgents remain a critical component of long-term peacebuilding, they are distinct from military structures and processes.

    As Nigeria continues to navigate its complex security landscape, clarity, transparency, and accountability remain essential—not only within the military but also across the information ecosystem that shapes public perception.

    Sources

    BBC News

    Al Jazeera

    Reuters

    Premium Times

    The Guardian Nigerian