selemedia.org

Category: Current Affairs

  • Oyo Assembly Rejects Ransom Talks, Demands Immediate Rescue of Abducted Students and Teachers!

    Oyo Assembly Rejects Ransom Talks, Demands Immediate Rescue of Abducted Students and Teachers!

    Reported by Fasesan Marian opeyemi | Editor-in-Chief, Journalist at Sele Media Africa.

    IBADAN, Nigeria— The Oyo State House of Assembly has formally rejected any form of negotiation with the armed group that abducted students and teachers in Oriire Local Government Area, demanding instead that security forces prioritise a swift, tactical rescue operation to secure the victims’ freedom.

    During an emergency plenary session on Tuesday, lawmakers passed a unanimous resolution condemning the attack and categorically ruling out ransom payments. The Assembly argued that engaging kidnappers financially would incentivise future abductions and erode public safety across the state. The decision places Oyo State at the centre of a growing national debate on the legal and ethical boundaries of negotiating with criminal non-state actors.

    Lawmakers Condemn Negotiation with Criminals

    The resolution, moved by the member representing Oriire State Constituency, Hon. Akeem Akintola, and seconded by the Majority Leader, Hon. Olasunkanmi Babalola, received overwhelming support from across party lines. Legislators emphasised that the state government must not yield to the demands of the kidnappers, whom they described as “enemies of the people.”

    “The Oyo State House of Assembly will not support any discussion that involves paying a ransom to these criminals. It sets a dangerous precedent and emboldens other criminal elements to target our schools,” Hon. Akintola stated on the floor of the House.

    The Assembly’s hardline stance aligns with Nigeria’s existing legal framework. Under the Terrorism (Prevention) Act of 2011, as amended, making or receiving ransom payments in connection with an act of terrorism is a criminal offence punishable by at least 15 years imprisonment. Kidnapping for ransom, particularly when it involves mass abductions, is treated as an act of terrorism under Nigerian law.

    Security and Conflict: The Urgent Rescue Imperative

    The abduction, which occurred late Monday evening, targeted a secondary school in the Kisi area of Oriire. Unconfirmed reports indicate that at least six students and two teachers were taken from the school premises by armed men who invaded the community on motorcycles. The attackers reportedly fired sporadically to disperse residents before rounding up their victims.

    Security agencies, including the Nigerian Police Force, the Department of State Services, and local vigilante groups, have been deployed to the area. However, as of press time, no official confirmation of the exact number of victims or the location of the abductees has been released by the Oyo State Government.

    The Assembly has called on the Commissioner of Police in Oyo State, CP Adebola Hamzat, to provide a detailed briefing on the rescue operation. Lawmakers also demanded the immediate activation of a joint security task force to conduct search-and-rescue operations in the forests bordering Oyo, Osun, and Kwara states, areas known to be hideouts for criminal gangs.

    “This is not just a matter of law enforcement; it is a matter of national security,” Hon. Babalola said during the debate. “We cannot allow our schools to become soft targets for armed groups. The security architecture of the state must be reviewed urgently.”

    Legal and Regulatory Implications: A Test for State Policy

    The Oyo Assembly’s rejection of ransom negotiations reinforces the legal prohibition against such payments. However, the stance raises complex questions about the safety of victims in active captivity. Human rights observers note that while the law forbids ransom, families of abducted victims often face agonising choices when state rescue operations are slow or ineffective.

    Nigeria’s legal system has struggled to balance the absolute prohibition of ransom with the practical realities of securing the release of hostages. In several high-profile mass abductions in northern Nigeria, state governments have been accused of paying ransoms secretly, despite legal prohibitions. The Oyo Assembly’s public declaration is an attempt to close that gap and enforce the law transparently.

    The Assembly also called on the Oyo State Government to expedite the implementation of the Oyo State Safety of Schools Policy, which mandates the installation of surveillance systems, perimeter fencing, and the deployment of dedicated security personnel to all public schools in the state. Lawmakers noted that the Oriire abduction underscores the urgency of fully operationalising these measures.

    Pan-African Significance: School Abductions as a Continental Crisis

    The abduction in Oyo State is not an isolated incident but part of a troubling pattern across Africa. From the Chibok girls in Nigeria to kidnappings in Cameroon’s Anglophone regions and attacks on schools in Burkina Faso and Mali, educational institutions have increasingly become targets of armed groups.

    The Oyo Assembly’s firm rejection of ransom negotiations signals a shift toward a more aggressive, security-first approach to school protection. This stance could influence policy debates in other African countries grappling with similar threats. If Oyo State successfully secures the victims’ release without payment, it could provide a model for other states and nations facing the dilemma of negotiating with kidnappers.

    The African Union’s Safe Schools Declaration, which Nigeria has endorsed, commits member states to protect education during armed conflict. The Oyo case will test whether that commitment translates into effective action at the state level.

    Reactions and Next Steps

    Civil society organisations in Oyo State have expressed cautious support for the Assembly’s position. The Oyo State chapter of the Nigerian Union of Teachers urged the government to prioritise the safety of the abducted educators and students above all else.

    “The lives of our members and the children are at stake. While we agree that criminals should not be rewarded, we urge the government to ensure that every possible resource is deployed to bring them home safely,” said Mr. Titus Adebayo, the union’s state secretary.

    The Oyo State Government has yet to issue an official statement on the Assembly’s resolution. However, sources within the Governor’s office indicate that the state security council is meeting to coordinate the response.

    The House of Assembly has given security agencies a 48-hour ultimatum to provide a comprehensive update on the rescue mission. Failure to do so, lawmakers warned, would trigger a motion for a full-scale parliamentary investigation into the state of security in Oriire and surrounding local government areas.

    As night falls on Oyo State, the families of the abducted students and teachers wait in anguish, hoping that the political resolve shown in the Assembly chamber translates into a swift and safe resolution on the ground.

    SOURCES

    • Channels Television
    • Punch Newspapers
    • Vanguard Nigeria
    • The Nation Newspaper
    • Tribune Online

  • Lagos Protesters Demand Rescue of Abducted Oyo Schoolchildren Amid Growing Insecurity!

    Lagos Protesters Demand Rescue of Abducted Oyo Schoolchildren Amid Growing Insecurity!

    Reported by Fasesan Marian opeyemi | Editor-in-Chief at Sele Media Africa.

    LAGOS, Nigeria — Hundreds of residents in Lagos marched on Wednesday to protest the escalating insecurity in Nigeria, demanding the immediate and safe rescue of an unspecified number of schoolchildren and teachers abducted from a school in Oyo State. The demonstrators, carrying placards and chanting slogans, urged federal and state authorities to intensify search-and-rescue operations and address the systemic failures that have allowed armed groups to repeatedly target educational institutions.

    The protest, which converged at the Lagos State Secretariat in Alausa, Ikeja, reflects a deepening public anxiety over the nation’s security crisis. Citizens expressed frustration at the government’s perceived inability to protect vulnerable populations, particularly children, from a wave of kidnappings that has plagued the country in recent years. The demonstration signals a growing grassroots demand for accountability and immediate action from security agencies.

    A Wave of Abductions Targeting Schools

    The protest in Lagos was triggered by the latest attack on a school in Oyo State, where armed men stormed the premises and abducted an unknown number of students and teachers. While official figures remain unconfirmed, local reports from Channels Television and Punch Newspapers suggest the assailants targeted the institution during school hours, a tactic that has become alarmingly common across northern and southwestern Nigeria.

    This incident is part of a broader pattern of insecurity targeting educational facilities. In 2021, over 300 schoolboys were abducted from the Government Science Secondary School in Kankara, Katsina State, an event that drew international condemnation. More recently, similar attacks have occurred in Zamfara, Kaduna, and Niger states. The Oyo abduction, however, has struck a particular nerve in Lagos, a megacity that has largely been spared such direct attacks on schools but remains deeply connected to the national security landscape.

    Security & Conflict: The Strategic Failure

    The persistent targeting of schools represents a significant strategic failure in Nigeria’s security architecture. According to security analysts, these attacks are not random acts of banditry but calculated operations aimed at extracting ransoms, creating widespread fear, and undermining state authority. The protesters in Lagos highlighted that the government’s reliance on a purely military response has proven insufficient, urging a multi-faceted approach that includes intelligence gathering, community policing, and socio-economic interventions.

    “We are tired of the government’s empty promises,” said Mrs. Folake Adeyemi, a teacher and protest organiser. “Our children are being taken from their classrooms, and the authorities seem unable to stop it. We demand the immediate rescue of the Oyo schoolchildren and a comprehensive plan to secure every school in Nigeria.”

    The protest also underscored the geopolitical dimension of the crisis. The abduction in Oyo, a state in the South-West, challenges the narrative that such attacks are confined to the conflict-ridden North-East and North-West. It signals a geographical expansion of the threat, placing pressure on regional security collaborations like the Amotekun security network, which operates in the South-West states.

    Public Outcry and Government Response

    The Lagos protest drew a diverse crowd, including parents, students, civil society activists, and market women. Many held signs reading “Bring Back Our Children” and “End Insecurity Now.” The demonstrators called for the immediate deployment of special forces to Oyo State and demanded transparency from the government regarding the number of victims and the progress of rescue efforts.

    In a statement, the Lagos State Police Command acknowledged the protest and assured residents of their safety. However, the protesters remained skeptical, citing a lack of tangible results from previous security pledges. The Oyo State Government, through its Commissioner for Information, confirmed that security agencies were working to locate the abducted victims but provided no details on the operation.

    The federal government, through the National Security Adviser’s office, has yet to issue a direct statement on the protest or the Oyo abduction. This silence has further fueled public anger, with critics accusing the administration of President Bola Tinubu of being disconnected from the daily realities of insecurity faced by ordinary Nigerians.

    Pan-African and Global Significance

    The abduction of schoolchildren in Nigeria is not merely a national crisis but a Pan-African and global concern. The United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) has repeatedly warned that attacks on schools are a violation of international humanitarian law and a direct assault on the future of the continent. The incident in Oyo adds Nigeria to a growing list of African nations—including Burkina Faso, Mali, and Cameroon—where armed groups have systematically targeted educational institutions.

    For the global community, the continued insecurity in Nigeria undermines investment, tourism, and diplomatic relations. The country, Africa’s largest economy and most populous nation, is seen as a bellwether for regional stability. The failure to protect its children sends a troubling signal about the state of governance and security across the continent.

    What Happens Next

    The immediate priority for security forces is the safe rescue of the abducted schoolchildren and teachers in Oyo State. Historically, such rescues have taken weeks or months, with many victims being released only after ransom payments—a practice the government officially condemns but has been accused of facilitating in the past.

    In the longer term, the Lagos protest has added to the political pressure on the Tinubu administration to declare a national state of emergency on security. Civil society groups are already planning further demonstrations in Abuja and other state capitals. The government’s response—whether through military action, policy reform, or dialogue—will determine whether the current wave of protests subsides or escalates into a broader movement demanding systemic change.

    For now, the families of the abducted victims in Oyo wait in agony, while the people of Lagos have made it clear: they are watching, and they will not remain silent.

    SOURCES
    BBC News, Channels Television, Punch Newspapers, Vanguard News, Premium Times.

  • Ibadan Kidnapping of Adelabu’s Sister, Twin Children Sparks Security Outcry.!

    Ibadan Kidnapping of Adelabu’s Sister, Twin Children Sparks Security Outcry.!

    Reported by Fasesan Marian opeyemi | Journalist at Sele Media Africa

    IBADAN, Nigeria — Tension has gripped Ibadan, Oyo State, following the reported abduction of the sister of former Minister of Power, Adebayo Adelabu, alongside her twin children. Eyewitnesses confirmed that residents gathered at the scene in the Oke-Bola area after the incident, which occurred on Tuesday, June 2, 2026, igniting widespread fear and urgent questions about the state of security in the region.

    Security agencies are yet to release comprehensive details about the circumstances of the kidnapping. Sources within the Oyo State Police Command confirmed that operatives have been deployed to the area, with search and rescue operations ongoing. The incident has renewed public debate on the rising wave of targeted kidnappings in Nigeria’s southwestern states.

    Background: A Pattern of High-Profile Abductions

    The abduction of a family member of a former federal minister underscores a troubling trend in Nigeria’s security landscape. Kidnapping for ransom, once largely confined to the Niger Delta and northern regions, has become a persistent threat in the South-West, including Lagos, Ogun, Oyo, and Ondo states.

    Adebayo Adelabu served as Minister of Power under former President Muhammadu Buhari from 2019 to 2023. He is also the 2023 governorship candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Oyo State. The targeting of his relatives signals that no family, regardless of political stature, is immune from the criminal networks operating across the country.

    Data from the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) indicates that over 1,200 kidnapping incidents were recorded across the South-West in 2025, a 15% increase from the previous year. Security analysts attribute the rise to economic hardship, porous borders, and insufficient police patrols in suburban and urban residential areas.

    Security and Conflict: The Immediate Response

    The Oyo State Police Command has launched a manhunt for the abductors, though officials have refrained from confirming whether a ransom demand has been made. A senior police officer, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Sele Media Africa that “tactical teams have been deployed to all exit routes from Ibadan.”

    The abduction has also triggered a political response. Governor Seyi Makinde of Oyo State condemned the incident in a statement released late Tuesday, assuring residents that security agencies are working “around the clock” to ensure the safe return of the victims. He called for calm but did not provide specific operational details.

    The incident has revived criticism of the state’s security architecture. Oyo State, like many others, relies heavily on the Nigeria Police Force, the Oyo State Security Network Agency (also known as Amotekun), and local vigilante groups. However, coordination among these entities remains weak, with jurisdictional disputes and lack of funding hampering effective responses.

    Explainer: What You Need to Know About Kidnapping in Nigeria

    Kidnapping in Nigeria has evolved from a regional crime into a national security crisis. While the motivations are often financial, some incidents are linked to political intimidation, land disputes, and organised crime.

    How it operates:

    • Targeting: Criminals often conduct surveillance on wealthy individuals, politicians, and their families.
    • Demand:Ransom demands typically range from ₦5 million to ₦100 million, depending on the victim’s perceived wealth.
    • Payment:Ransoms are often paid through mobile money transfers or cryptocurrency to avoid detection.
    • Release:Victims are usually released within days or weeks, though some are killed if negotiations fail.

    Why it persists:

    • Poverty and unemployment: Many young men turn to kidnapping as a lucrative alternative to legitimate work.
    • Weak law enforcement: Police are understaffed, underpaid, and lack modern forensic and tracking tools.
    • Corruption: Some security personnel collude with kidnappers, sharing intelligence or facilitating ransom payments.
    • Porous borders: Arms and criminals flow easily across Nigeria’s borders with Benin, Niger, and Cameroon.

    Who is most at risk:

    • Business executives and their families
    • Politicians and their relatives
    • Traditional rulers and religious leaders
    • Ordinary citizens in rural and suburban areas.

    Reactions: Political and Civil Society Voices

    The abduction has drawn condemnation across the political spectrum. Senator Teslim Folarin, representing Oyo Central, called the incident “a painful reminder that no one is safe until we fix our security infrastructure.” He urged the federal government to declare a state of emergency on kidnapping.

    Civil society organisations have also weighed in. The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Ibadan branch, issued a statement demanding “immediate and transparent action” from security agencies. The group warned that continued impunity would erode public trust in the state’s ability to protect its citizens.

    Residents of Oke-Bola, where the abduction occurred, expressed anger and fear. “We are tired of living in fear,” said local trader Bose Adeyemi. “The government must do something before we all become prisoners in our own homes.”

    Pan-African and Global Significances

    Nigeria’s kidnapping crisis has implications that extend beyond its borders. The country is Africa’s largest economy and most populous nation, and its instability affects regional trade, investment, and migration patterns.

    The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) has identified transnational organised crime, including kidnapping, as a major threat to regional security. In 2025, ECOWAS launched a regional action plan to combat kidnapping and human trafficking, but implementation has been slow.

    International partners, including the United Kingdom and the United States, have issued travel advisories warning their citizens about the risk of kidnapping in Nigeria. Such advisories can deter foreign investment and tourism, further straining the economy.

    For African nations grappling with similar security challenges—such as South Africa, Kenya, and the Sahel states—Nigeria’s experience offers both cautionary lessons and potential models for intervention. Strengthening community policing, investing in surveillance technology, and addressing root causes like poverty are seen as essential steps.

    What Happens Next

    The immediate priority for security agencies is the safe rescue of Adelabu’s sister and her children. If successful, the operation could boost public confidence in law enforcement. If not, it may trigger further protests and demands for accountability.

    In the medium term, the Oyo State government is expected to review its security strategy. Proposals include increasing the budget for Amotekun, deploying drones for surveillance, and establishing a dedicated anti-kidnapping task force.

    At the national level, the incident could reignite calls for constitutional reform to allow state police, a long-debated measure that proponents argue would improve local security responses.

    For now, the people of Ibadan wait—and watch.

    SOURCES

    • Punch Newspapers
    • Vanguard Nigeria
    • The Nation Nigeria
    • Channels Television
    • Oyo State Police Command (anonymous official)
    • Nigerian Bar Association, Ibadan branch
    • Bose Adeyemi (resident, Oke-Bola, Ibadan)
    • Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) annual report, 2025

  • NANS to Stage Protest Over Abduction of 42 Borno Students!

    Reported by Enock Damidami, Social Media Manager | Journalist at Sele Media Africa


    The National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS), Zone E, has announced plans to stage a peaceful solidarity protest across the North-East following the abduction of 42 students from Government Day Secondary School, Mussa, in Askira/Uba Local Government Area of Borno State.
    The students’ body said the demonstration is aimed at drawing national attention to the plight of the abducted students and pressuring relevant authorities to intensify efforts toward their rescue. The planned protest comes amid growing concern among parents, community leaders, education stakeholders, and residents of the region over the continued insecurity affecting schools and rural communities.
    According to NANS Zone E, all student leaders and members across tertiary institutions in the North-East have been directed to participate in the protest, which the association described as a peaceful expression of solidarity with the victims and their families.
    In a statement issued by the leadership of the association, NANS condemned the abduction and described it as an attack on education, human dignity, and the future of young Nigerians. The group stressed that students across the country cannot remain silent while innocent children are taken from their schools and communities.
    The association noted that education remains one of the most important tools for development and nation-building, warning that repeated attacks on schools could discourage parents from allowing their children to pursue education, especially in rural communities where access to quality learning is already limited.
    The abduction reportedly occurred during an attack on Mussa community in Askira/Uba Local Government Area. Armed men were said to have invaded the area, targeting the school and surrounding residences before taking dozens of children away. Local authorities later confirmed that 42 students and children were missing following the incident.
    The development has generated widespread concern throughout Borno State and beyond. Families of the victims have continued to appeal to security agencies and government authorities to take urgent action to secure the safe return of their children.
    For many residents, the incident has revived painful memories of previous mass abductions that shocked the nation and attracted international attention. Over the years, schools in parts of northern Nigeria have faced attacks by armed groups, leading to the disruption of academic activities and increased fears among students and parents.
    NANS said the planned protest would not only demand the rescue of the abducted students but would also call for stronger security measures around schools across the country. The association argued that educational institutions should be safe spaces where students can learn without fear of violence or kidnapping.
    Student leaders emphasized that the protest would remain peaceful and lawful, urging participants to conduct themselves responsibly throughout the exercise. They also called on security agencies to support efforts aimed at ensuring that the demonstration is carried out without disruption.
    The association further urged the Federal Government to strengthen intelligence gathering and increase surveillance in vulnerable communities, particularly in areas that have experienced repeated security threats. According to NANS, a more proactive approach is needed to prevent future attacks on schools and protect the lives of students.
    Meanwhile, rescue efforts are reportedly ongoing. Security agencies and government officials have assured residents that operations aimed at locating and recovering the abducted children are underway. Authorities have continued to maintain that every effort is being made to ensure the victims are returned safely.
    The Borno State Government has also reiterated its commitment to securing the release of the students. State officials have held consultations with security agencies and community leaders as part of efforts to coordinate an effective response to the incident.
    Education advocates and civil society organizations have joined calls for urgent action, arguing that attacks on schools undermine educational progress and threaten the future of thousands of children. Many have called for increased investment in school security infrastructure and the expansion of programmes designed to protect students in conflict-prone areas.
    Across social media platforms, Nigerians have expressed solidarity with the affected families while calling on authorities to prioritize the rescue mission. The incident has sparked widespread discussions about the need for more effective security strategies in communities vulnerable to attacks.
    Residents of Mussa community remain hopeful that the students will be rescued and reunited with their families. However, anxiety continues to grow as parents await positive news regarding the whereabouts and condition of their children.
    Observers believe the planned NANS protest could further amplify public demands for accountability and action. By mobilizing students across the North-East, the association hopes to keep attention focused on the plight of the abducted children and ensure that efforts to secure their freedom remain a national priority.
    As preparations for the demonstration continue, many Nigerians are watching closely to see how authorities respond to both the protest and the ongoing rescue operations. For the families of the victims, however, the primary concern remains the safe and immediate return of their children.
    The incident serves as another reminder of the security challenges facing parts of northern Nigeria and the urgent need for sustained efforts to safeguard schools, students, and communities from future attacks.


    Sources
    National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS)
    Borno State Government
    Security and community reports from Askira/Uba LGA

  • Bamiloye Defends Adeboye, Says Expecting 84-Year-Old Cleric to Lead Protests Is Unrealistic!

    Bamiloye Defends Adeboye, Says Expecting 84-Year-Old Cleric to Lead Protests Is Unrealistic!

    Reported by Fasesan Marian opeyemi | Journalist at Sele Media Africa

    LAGOS, Nigeria — Evangelist Mike Bamiloye has publicly defended Pastor Enoch Adeboye, the General Overseer of the Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG), against mounting criticism over his response to Nigeria’s worsening security crisis, arguing that expecting an 84-year-old religious leader to lead street protests is both unrealistic and a misunderstanding of spiritual leadership.

    Bamiloye, founder of the Mount Zion Faith Ministries, made the remarks in a statement shared on social media on Tuesday, June 2, 2026, amid a growing national debate over the role of religious figures in addressing the country’s escalating insecurity, including kidnappings, banditry, and farmer-herder conflicts. The defense comes weeks after Adeboye faced public backlash for not taking a more vocal or visible stance against the government’s handling of security failures.

    The Defense of Spiritual Leadership

    In his statement, Bamiloye argued that Adeboye’s primary calling is spiritual, not political or activist. “Pastor Adeboye is 84 years old. To expect him to lead a protest march or hold a press conference demanding government action is to misunderstand the nature of his ministry,” Bamiloye said. “His role is to pray, counsel, and guide the nation through spiritual means. That is not weakness; it is wisdom.”

    Bamiloye emphasized that Adeboye has consistently used his platform to pray for Nigeria’s peace and to counsel leaders privately, a method he described as more effective than public demonstrations. “Not every leader is called to the streets. Some are called to the altar, to the prayer closet, and to the counsel chamber,” he added.

    The evangelist’s comments have reignited a broader conversation across Nigeria and the Pan-African community about the appropriate boundaries between religious authority and civic activism, particularly in a country where faith leaders wield significant influence over millions of followers.

    A Nation in Crisis: The Security Context

    Nigeria continues to grapple with a multifaceted security crisis that has worsened over the past year. According to the Nigeria Security Tracker, at least 4,700 civilians were killed in violent incidents between January and May 2026, a 12 percent increase from the same period in 2025. Kidnappings for ransom have become routine in the Northwest and North-Central regions, while bandit attacks and clashes between farmers and herders have displaced hundreds of thousands.

    In February 2026, armed gunmen abducted 287 schoolchildren from a government secondary school in Kuriga, Kaduna State, sparking national outrage. The children were released after weeks of negotiations, but the incident intensified calls for religious and traditional leaders to use their influence to demand accountability from the government.

    Critics argue that figures like Adeboye, who commands a global following of millions, have a moral obligation to speak out forcefully and publicly against government inaction. Some have accused him of being too close to political leaders, including President Bola Tinubu, whom he has publicly prayed for on multiple occasions.

    The Human Dimension: An 84-Year-Old Man Under Pressure

    Behind the theological and political arguments lies a deeply human story. Pastor Enoch Adeboye, born on March 2, 1942, in Ifewara, Osun State, has led the RCCG for over four decades, transforming it from a small Nigerian church into a global denomination with millions of members in nearly 200 countries. He is widely regarded as one of Africa’s most influential religious figures.

    At 84, Adeboye’s health has been a subject of concern. In 2024, he underwent a successful surgery in Lagos, after which he took a brief leave from public ministry. His age and physical limitations are central to Bamiloye’s defense. “We must remember that this is an elderly man who has given his life to serving God and humanity. To demand that he now become a political activist is to ignore his age, his calling, and his dignity,” Bamiloye said.

    The human interest angle resonates deeply with many Nigerians who view Adeboye as a father figure. For them, the expectation that he should risk his health and safety by joining protests is not only unrealistic but also disrespectful. Yet for others, particularly younger activists, the urgency of the security crisis demands that no leader, regardless of age, remain silent.

    Reactions from Religious and Civil Society Leaders

    The debate has drawn reactions from across Nigeria’s religious and civil society landscape. Reverend Father John Odeyemi, a Catholic priest and human rights activist based in Abuja, told Sele Media Africa that while he respects Adeboye, the crisis requires more than prayers. “Prayer is essential, but it is not enough. Religious leaders must also use their moral authority to demand justice and accountability from those in power,” Odeyemi said.

    On the other hand, Sheikh Khalid Aliyu, a prominent Islamic scholar from Kano, defended Adeboye, stating that religious leaders should not be forced into roles they were not called to. “Every leader has a different path. Some are called to the streets, others to the pulpit. We must respect that diversity,” Aliyu said.

    Civil society groups, including the Nigeria Civil Society Situation Room, have called for a more coordinated approach involving religious, traditional, and political leaders. “We need all hands on deck, but we must also respect the unique roles each leader plays,” said Clement Nwankwo, the group’s coordinator.

    The Pan-African Significance

    The debate over Adeboye’s role is not unique to Nigeria. Across Africa, religious leaders often occupy a delicate position between spiritual authority and political influence. In Kenya, Archbishop Desmond Tutu’s legacy of anti-apartheid activism set a precedent for faith leaders engaging in public life. In Ghana, the National Peace Council, which includes religious figures, has mediated political disputes.

    However, the Nigerian case highlights a tension that is playing out across the continent: as security crises deepen and governance failures persist, citizens are increasingly looking to all leaders—including religious ones—to take a stand. The question of whether an elderly cleric should lead protests is, at its core, a question about the nature of leadership itself in times of crisis.

    For the Pan-African audience, the Adeboye debate underscores a broader challenge: how to balance respect for elder statesmen and spiritual leaders with the urgent need for accountability and action. It also raises questions about the limits of spiritual leadership in secular governance.

    What Happens Next

    As of June 3, 2026, Pastor Adeboye has not publicly responded to the criticism or to Bamiloye’s defense. Sources close to the RCCG indicate that he continues to focus on his pastoral duties and private prayers for the nation. The church has not issued an official statement on the matter.

    Meanwhile, the security crisis in Nigeria shows no signs of abating. Analysts predict that the debate over the role of religious leaders will intensify, particularly as the 2027 general elections approach. For now, Bamiloye’s defense has provided a rallying point for those who believe that spiritual leadership should remain distinct from political activism.

    Sources

    • Punch Newspapers
    • Vanguard
    • TheCable
    • Daily Post Nigeria
    • Leadership Newspaper
    • Nigeria Security Tracker
    • Interview with Rev. Fr. John Odeyemi, Abuja
    • Interview with Sheikh Khalid Aliyu, Kano
    • Interview with Clement Nwankwo, Nigeria Civil Society Situation Room

  • Ado-Ekiti Protest Erupts as Kidnappers Demand Fresh ₦50 Million After ₦10.5 Million Ransom!

    Ado-Ekiti Protest Erupts as Kidnappers Demand Fresh ₦50 Million After ₦10.5 Million Ransom!

    Reported by Fasesan Marian opeyemi, Editor-in-Chief | Journalist at Sele Media Africa.

    ADO-EKITI, Nigeria — Hundreds of residents in Ado-Ekiti took to the streets on Tuesday in a furious protest against the continued captivity of 16 church members abducted last week, after reports emerged that their kidnappers had demanded an additional ₦50 million ransom despite already receiving ₦10.5 million from desperate families and community members.

    The protest, which paralysed major roads in the Ekiti State capital, marks a dramatic escalation of public anger over the worsening security crisis in the state. Demonstrators carried placards demanding immediate military intervention and the unconditional release of the victims, who were seized from their church premises in the Ijan area of Ekiti State on May 27.

    The abduction has plunged the community into a state of terror and financial ruin, as families who had already mortgaged assets to raise the initial ransom now face an impossible second demand.

    A Community Under Siege

    The 16 victims, all members of a local Pentecostal church, were kidnapped during a night prayer session. The abductors, armed with assault rifles, stormed the church building and herded the worshippers into waiting vehicles before disappearing into the surrounding forests.

    Local sources told Sele Media Africa that the kidnappers initially demanded ₦60 million as a collective ransom. After days of frantic negotiations, families and church leaders managed to raise and deliver ₦10.5 million—a sum that required contributions from extended families, church offerings, and emergency loans.

    “We sold everything. We borrowed from everyone. We thought the payment would bring them home,” said a relative of one victim, who spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals. “When we paid the ₦10.5 million, the kidnappers told us to wait. Then they called again and said ₦50 million more or they will start killing them.”

    The second demand has shattered any remaining hope among the families and triggered the mass protest that drew hundreds to the streets of Ado-Ekiti on Tuesday.

    Security & Conflict: The Anatomy of a Failing Response

    The Ado-Ekiti protest exposes a deepening security crisis in Ekiti State, which had previously been considered one of Nigeria’s relatively safer states. The abduction of 16 worshippers from a church—a place of sanctuary—represents a significant escalation in the tactics and audacity of criminal gangs operating in the Southwest.

    Security analysts say the incident reflects a broader pattern of organised crime networks exploiting gaps in Nigeria’s security architecture. The kidnappers’ ability to hold victims for over a week without a successful military or police rescue operation raises serious questions about the capacity of state security forces.

    “The fact that these criminals can demand a ransom, receive it, and then demand more with impunity shows that they operate with near-total confidence that they will not be intercepted,” said Dr. Kunle Adeyemi, a security studies lecturer at Ekiti State University. “This is not random banditry. This is organised crime with intelligence networks, safe houses, and probably complicity within the system.”

    The protest also highlights the growing frustration of citizens who feel abandoned by both state and federal authorities. Demonstrators blocked the Ado-Ekiti–Akure Road, burning tyres and chanting songs of anger, as police in riot gear watched from a distance.

    Ekiti State Governor Biodun Oyebanji has called for calm, stating that security agencies are working “tirelessly” to secure the victims’ release. However, no timeline or specific operational details have been provided, fuelling public distrust.

    Follow-the-Money: The Economics of Kidnapping in Nigeria

    The ransom saga in Ado-Ekiti is a stark illustration of the lucrative criminal economy that kidnapping-for-ransom has become across Nigeria. The initial ₦10.5 million payment, followed by a ₦50 million demand, represents a total ransom target of ₦60.5 million—a sum that far exceeds the annual income of most families in the region.

    Kidnapping-for-ransom has evolved into a multi-billion-naira illicit industry in Nigeria, with criminal networks treating abductions as business transactions. The Ekiti case shows the brutal mechanics of this trade: families are squeezed for every kobo they can raise, then hit with a second demand designed to extract maximum value.

    “This is a predatory economic model,” said financial crime analyst Chioma Okeke. “The kidnappers know exactly how much families can raise. They take the first payment as a deposit, then apply pressure for more. It is extortion with a human hostage as collateral.”

    The economic impact on affected families is devastating. In the Ado-Ekiti case, multiple families have reported selling farmland, livestock, and household assets. Some have taken loans from informal lenders at crushing interest rates. The psychological and financial trauma will persist long after the victims are released—if they are released at all.

    The broader macroeconomic effect is also significant. Insecurity in the Southwest is deterring investment, disrupting agricultural production, and forcing businesses to spend heavily on private security. The Nigerian economy loses an estimated ₦2.5 trillion annually to various forms of crime, including kidnapping, according to a 2024 report by the Nigerian Economic Summit Group.

    Pan-African and Global Significance

    The Ado-Ekiti kidnapping is not an isolated incident but part of a broader crisis of insecurity that affects multiple African nations. From the Sahel to the Lake Chad Basin, kidnapping-for-ransom has become a preferred funding mechanism for both criminal gangs and armed groups.

    In Nigeria alone, over 4,000 people were abducted in 2025, according to data from the Nigeria Security Tracker. The trend is mirrored in countries such as Somalia, where Al-Shabaab uses kidnapping to finance operations, and in northern Mozambique, where insurgent groups employ similar tactics.

    The international community has taken note. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) has identified kidnapping-for-ransom as a growing threat to human security and economic development across Africa. The US State Department’s 2025 Trafficking in Persons Report cited Nigeria as a country of particular concern, noting the “widespread use of kidnapping to extort ransom payments from families and communities.”

    The Ado-Ekiti case also highlights the failure of legal and institutional frameworks to deter these crimes. Despite Nigeria’s Anti-Kidnapping Act of 2020, which prescribes life imprisonment for convicted kidnappers, prosecution rates remain abysmally low. Many cases never reach court, and those that do often result in plea bargains or acquittals due to weak evidence and witness intimidation.

    What Happens Next

    As of press time, the 16 church members remain in captivity. The Ekiti State government has announced a security council meeting for Wednesday, and the police have deployed additional tactical units to the forests around Ijan. However, no rescue operation has been publicly confirmed.

    The families have launched a public appeal for donations to meet the new ₦50 million demand, a move that has drawn criticism from anti-kidnapping advocates who argue that paying ransoms only fuels the criminal economy.

    “We know it is wrong. We know it makes things worse. But what choice do we have?” one relative said, weeping.

    The Ado-Ekiti protest has now spread to neighbouring communities, with residents demanding a permanent security solution. Many are calling for the declaration of a state of emergency on kidnapping in the Southwest.

    For now, the fate of the 16 church members hangs in the balance—a grim testament to the human cost of Nigeria’s unrelenting security crisis.

    SOURCES

    • Punch Newspapers, “Ado-Ekiti Protest Over ₦50m Fresh Ransom Demand,” June 3, 2026.
    • Vanguard, “Ekiti Kidnap: Families Pay ₦10.5m, Abductors Demand ₦50m More,” June 2, 2026.
    • The Nation, “16 Church Members Still in Captivity as Protest Rocks Ado-Ekiti,” June 3, 2026.
    • Daily Trust, “Ekiti Kidnapping: Governor Oyebanji Calls for Calm,” June 2, 2026.
    • Channels Television, “Ado-Ekiti Protesters Block Major Roads Over Kidnapping,” June 3, 2026.
    • Interview with relative of victim (anonymous), Ado-Ekiti, June 3, 2026.
    • Dr. Kunle Adeyemi, Security Studies Lecturer, Ekiti State University, interview June 3, 2026.
    • Chioma Okeke, Financial Crime Analyst, interview June 3, 2026.
    • Nigerian Economic Summit Group, “Cost of Crime in Nigeria Report,” 2024.
    • US State Department, “2025 Trafficking in Persons Report: Nigeria.”

  • Osun Schools Shut Down Amid Bandit Scare as Adeleke Moves to Strengthen Security!

    Reported by Enock Damidami, Social Media Manager | Journalist at Sele Media Africa


    Panic swept across several communities in Osun State on Tuesday as public and private schools abruptly shut down following reports that suspected bandits had allegedly threatened schools in parts of the state.
    The development triggered fear among parents, teachers, and residents, leading many schools in affected areas to dismiss students and suspend academic activities as a precautionary measure. Reports indicated that rumours of possible attacks spread rapidly across communities including Ikirun, Ila-Orangun, Iree, Obaagun, Eripa, and other neighbouring towns, prompting school authorities to take immediate action.

    The scare was reportedly linked to claims that suspected bandits had delivered threatening messages targeting schools. Although the reports caused widespread anxiety, the Osun State Government has maintained that security checks conducted across the state found no confirmed case of school abduction or bandit invasion.

    Governor Ademola Adeleke urged residents to remain calm and avoid spreading unverified information. According to the governor, security agencies and the Ministry of Education have already activated measures designed to protect schools and ensure the safety of pupils and students throughout the state.

    In a statement issued through his spokesperson, the governor described the reports as a false alarm and insisted that investigations conducted in border communities and other parts of the state did not reveal any ongoing school kidnapping operation. He assured parents that the government was taking proactive steps to prevent any potential security threat.

    Despite the government’s assurances, the fear generated by the rumours was enough to disrupt academic activities in several local government areas. Many parents rushed to schools to pick up their children, while some institutions closed before midday to avoid exposing students to any potential danger.

    The incident comes just weeks after Governor Adeleke directed the revitalisation of Osun’s Safe School Initiative following growing concerns about school kidnappings in parts of southwestern Nigeria. The initiative focuses on strengthening security around educational institutions, improving intelligence gathering, and enhancing collaboration between security agencies and local communities.


    As concern mounted, the governor also disclosed that the state had intensified security consultations involving police, Amotekun personnel, hunters, community security groups, and other stakeholders to strengthen protection for schools and communities. He added that security operatives had been placed on alert to respond swiftly to any emerging threat.


    Education stakeholders have expressed concern over the psychological impact such scares can have on students and parents. Many warned that even unverified threats can disrupt learning, create fear, and undermine confidence in the education system.
    Residents have called on security agencies to increase surveillance around schools and provide regular updates to the public in order to prevent panic and misinformation. Community leaders also urged citizens to verify information before sharing it on social media.
    While schools gradually resumed normal activities following government assurances, the incident has once again highlighted growing concerns about school security across Nigeria. Many parents say they remain worried about the safety of their children and are calling for stronger preventive measures to protect educational institutions from potential attacks.
    For now, Osun authorities insist that schools remain safe and that there is no confirmed case of bandits abducting students within the state. However, the panic that forced schools to shut their gates serves as a reminder of the anxiety insecurity continues to generate across the country.

    Sources
    Osun State Government
    Punch Newspapers
    PM News Nigeria
    The Guardian Nigeria
    Osun Defender

  • PDP Faction Ratifies Goodluck Jonathan as Sole Presidential Candidate for 2027!

    PDP Faction Ratifies Goodluck Jonathan as Sole Presidential Candidate for 2027!

    Reported by Fasesan Marian opeyemi | Editor-in-Chief at Sele Media Africa.

    ABUJA, Nigeria — A faction of Nigeria’s main opposition party, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), has ratified former President Goodluck Jonathan as its sole presidential candidate for the 2027 general election, a move that underscores the deepening leadership crisis within the party and signals a potentially fragmented opposition landscape ahead of the next electoral cycle.

    The endorsement was approved during a special convention convened by the Tanimu Turaki-led PDP faction in Abuja on Monday. Jonathan, who served as Nigeria’s president from 2010 to 2015, was absent from the event. Allies and representatives received nomination documents on his behalf, according to multiple sources. The development highlights the continuing divisions within the PDP, which has been embroiled in internal leadership disputes since its 2023 presidential election loss.

    A Divided House: The Turaki Faction and Its Claims

    The faction, led by former Minister of Special Duties Tanimu Turaki, claims to represent the authentic structure of the PDP. Turaki has been locked in a protracted legal and political battle with the party’s National Working Committee (NWC) led by Acting National Chairman Umar Damagum. The Damagum-led NWC has been recognised by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) as the legitimate leadership of the PDP, a status that Turaki’s faction has challenged in court.

    During the convention, delegates from several states passed a resolution declaring Jonathan as the faction’s sole candidate. The resolution cited what it described as the former president’s “unifying national appeal” and “track record of electoral integrity,” particularly referencing his decision to concede the 2015 presidential election to then-candidate Muhammadu Buhari—a move widely praised as a benchmark for democratic maturity in Africa.

    However, Jonathan has not publicly accepted the nomination. His silence, coupled with his absence from the convention, has fuelled speculation about whether he is actively seeking a return to the presidency or whether the faction is using his name to gain political legitimacy.

    Political Implications: A Fractured Opposition and a Weakened PDP

    The endorsement carries significant political implications for Nigeria’s opposition landscape. By anointing a candidate outside the party’s official structure, the Turaki faction has effectively declared that the PDP’s current leadership lacks the authority to determine the party’s presidential ticket.

    This fracture weakens the PDP’s ability to present a united front against the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) in 2027. Political analysts warn that if the party enters the election cycle with two competing leadership structures and multiple candidates, it risks splitting the opposition vote—a scenario that would benefit the APC.

    “The PDP is in its most fragile state since its formation in 1998,” said Dr. Jibrin Ibrahim, a senior fellow at the Centre for Democracy and Development (CDD). “A factional endorsement of a candidate before the party has resolved its leadership disputes is not a sign of strength. It is a symptom of a party that is haemorrhaging internal cohesion.”

    The development also raises questions about the viability of Jonathan’s potential candidacy. While he retains a loyal following in the Niger Delta region and among some PDP elders, his political brand is tied to his 2015 concession. A return to active politics could invite scrutiny of his tenure, including the 2014 oil price crash, the rise of Boko Haram insurgency, and allegations of corruption within his administration.

    Jonathan’s Silence: Strategy or Disinterest?

    Jonathan’s absence from the convention and his failure to acknowledge the endorsement have created a vacuum of interpretation. Some political observers suggest that the former president is deliberately keeping his options open, waiting to see which faction emerges stronger before committing publicly.

    Others argue that Jonathan may not be interested in a return to the presidency at all. Since leaving office, he has positioned himself as an elder statesman, engaging in international mediation efforts in West Africa and serving as a special envoy for the African Union. At 68, he may prefer a legacy as a regional peacemaker rather than a candidate in what is likely to be a bitterly contested election.

    “Jonathan has built a post-presidential career as a diplomat and mediator,” said Dr. Olayinka Oyegbile, a political communications expert. “Entering a divisive primary battle would risk undermining that reputation. He may be weighing whether the political cost is worth the potential reward.”

    Pan-African Significance: A Test for Democratic Norms

    Beyond Nigeria, the PDP’s internal crisis holds lessons for opposition parties across Africa. In many countries on the continent, opposition parties have struggled to maintain unity after electoral defeats, often fragmenting into warring factions that weaken democratic accountability.

    Nigeria is Africa’s most populous democracy and its largest economy. The health of its political system has ripple effects across the West African region and beyond. A fractured, dysfunctional opposition reduces the quality of electoral competition, diminishes voter choice, and can erode public trust in democratic institutions.

    The Jonathan endorsement also highlights a recurring theme in African politics: the lure of former presidents returning to power. In recent years, several African countries have seen former heads of state attempt comebacks, including in Kenya, Zambia, and Ghana. These efforts often provoke debates about term limits, political dynasties, and the consolidation of democratic norms.

    “The question is not whether Jonathan can win, but whether the process by which he becomes a candidate respects the rule of law and internal party democracy,” said Dr. Ibrahim. “If a faction can simply anoint a candidate without a legitimate primary, it sets a dangerous precedent for the entire opposition ecosystem.”

    What Happens Next: Legal Battles and Political Realignments

    The immediate future of the PDP’s presidential ticket will likely be decided in the courts. The Turaki faction has filed multiple cases challenging the legitimacy of the Damagum-led NWC, and the Supreme Court may ultimately have to rule on which faction is the authentic PDP.

    If the courts side with the Turaki faction, Jonathan could become the official PDP candidate without having to contest a primary. If the courts uphold the Damagum-led NWC, the faction’s endorsement would be void, and the party would still need to select a candidate through a formal convention.

    Meanwhile, other opposition figures are already positioning themselves for 2027. Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, who was the PDP’s candidate in 2023, has not ruled out another run. Labour Party candidate Peter Obi and New Nigeria Peoples Party candidate Rabiu Kwankwaso are also expected to be in the race, potentially creating a crowded field that could split the opposition vote further.

    For Jonathan, the coming months will be a test of political will. He must decide whether to embrace the faction’s endorsement and actively campaign, or to distance himself and preserve his statesman status. Either decision will shape not only his legacy but also the trajectory of Nigeria’s opposition ahead of 2027.

    SOURCES

    • Voice of Nigeria (VON)
    • BusinessDay Nigeria
    • The ICIR
    • Nigeria Info FM
    • Vanguard News
    • Centre for Democracy and Development (CDD)

  • Borno NUT Joins Solidarity Rallies Over Worsening School Abductions!

    Reported by Enock Damidami, Social Media Manager | Journalist at Sele Media Africa


    Members of the Nigeria Union of Teachers (NUT) in Borno State have joined solidarity rallies to protest the increasing incidents of school abductions across the country, calling on the government and security agencies to take urgent and decisive action to protect students, teachers, and educational institutions.
    The demonstrations, which attracted teachers from various parts of the state, highlighted growing concerns over the safety of schools, particularly in regions affected by insecurity. Participants carried placards with messages demanding improved security measures, enhanced protection for educational facilities, and stronger efforts to prevent future attacks on schools.
    The rallies come amid renewed fears over the safety of learning environments following reports of increasing threats against schools in different parts of Nigeria. Teachers expressed concern that the continued targeting of educational institutions by criminal groups is undermining access to education and creating fear among students, parents, and educators.
    Speaking during the protest, union leaders emphasized that schools should remain safe spaces dedicated to learning and development rather than becoming targets for criminal activities. They argued that the recurring incidents of abductions have negatively affected school attendance and disrupted academic activities in many communities.
    According to the teachers, many parents are increasingly reluctant to send their children to school due to concerns about safety. This situation, they said, poses a significant threat to efforts aimed at improving educational outcomes and increasing enrollment rates, particularly in rural and vulnerable communities.
    The NUT noted that the issue of school abductions extends beyond individual states and has become a national concern requiring coordinated action by all levels of government. Union representatives urged federal and state authorities to strengthen security around schools and ensure that students can pursue their education without fear.
    Teachers participating in the rally also called for the implementation of more effective school protection strategies. They recommended increased deployment of security personnel to vulnerable areas, improved intelligence gathering, installation of surveillance systems, and stronger collaboration between security agencies and local communities.
    The union further stressed the importance of investing in educational infrastructure designed to enhance security. Such measures, they argued, should include perimeter fencing, secure hostels, emergency communication systems, and rapid-response mechanisms capable of addressing threats before they escalate into major incidents.
    Over the years, Nigeria has witnessed several high-profile school abductions that have drawn national and international attention. These incidents have not only resulted in trauma for affected students and families but have also disrupted academic programs and forced the temporary closure of schools in some areas.
    Security experts have warned that persistent attacks on educational institutions could have long-term consequences for national development. They argue that fear of abduction discourages school attendance, contributes to rising dropout rates, and threatens progress in expanding access to quality education.
    In Borno State, which has faced security challenges for more than a decade, educators say significant efforts have been made to rebuild the education sector following years of disruption caused by insurgency. However, concerns remain that continued threats against schools could undermine these gains.
    The protesting teachers maintained that ensuring the safety of schools should be treated as a national priority. They called for stronger implementation of existing policies aimed at protecting educational institutions and urged authorities to allocate adequate resources to school security initiatives.
    Union officials also emphasized the need for greater support for teachers working in high-risk areas. They noted that many educators continue to perform their duties under difficult conditions despite concerns about their personal safety and that of their students.
    The NUT praised teachers across the country for their resilience and dedication to education despite ongoing security challenges. At the same time, the union insisted that educators should not be expected to bear the burden of insecurity alone.
    Parents and community leaders who expressed support for the rallies echoed calls for urgent government intervention. Many argued that the protection of schools is essential for the future of Nigerian children and the overall development of the country.
    Education advocates have similarly called on authorities to strengthen initiatives such as the Safe Schools Programme, which was established to improve the security of educational institutions and reduce vulnerabilities to attacks.
    Analysts believe that addressing school abductions will require a combination of improved security operations, community engagement, intelligence gathering, and sustained investment in education infrastructure. They argue that a comprehensive approach is necessary to tackle the root causes of insecurity while ensuring immediate protection for students and teachers.
    The solidarity rallies organized by the Borno NUT reflect growing frustration among educators over the continued threats facing schools. Protesters warned that failure to address the problem could further weaken confidence in the education system and place millions of children at risk.
    As the demonstrations concluded, participants reiterated their demand for swift and effective action to safeguard educational institutions across Nigeria. They expressed hope that their voices would prompt authorities to prioritize school security and take concrete steps to prevent future abductions.
    For many teachers, the message of the rally was clear: every child deserves the right to learn in a safe environment, and every teacher deserves the assurance that their workplace is protected from violence and criminal attacks. They maintained that protecting schools is not only an educational issue but also a matter of national security and social development.
    The NUT pledged to continue advocating for safer schools and stronger protection measures until meaningful progress is achieved. Union leaders said they remain committed to working with government agencies, security institutions, and community stakeholders to ensure that Nigerian schools remain places of learning, hope, and opportunity rather than targets of fear.


    Sources:
    Statements from the Nigeria Union of Teachers (NUT), reports from solidarity rallies in Borno State, and ongoing discussions on school security in Nigeria.

  • Security agencies can track bandits if they want to – Buratai!

    Reported by Enock Damidami, Social Media Manager | Journalist at Sele Media Africa


    Former Chief of Army Staff and former Nigerian Ambassador to the Republic of Benin, Tukur Yusuf Buratai, has stated that Nigeria‘s security agencies have the capacity to effectively track and locate bandits, terrorists, kidnappers, and other criminal elements operating across the country if the available intelligence and technological resources are fully utilized.
    Buratai made the remarks while speaking on the ongoing security challenges facing Nigeria, particularly in regions affected by banditry, terrorism, and kidnapping. According to him, advances in modern surveillance technology, telecommunications monitoring, intelligence gathering, and inter-agency cooperation have made it possible for security institutions to identify, monitor, and apprehend criminal networks when such tools are properly deployed.


    His comments come at a time when concerns over insecurity continue to dominate national discourse. Communities across several states have continued to experience attacks linked to bandits, kidnappers, and terrorist groups, leading to calls for stronger action from security agencies and the government.
    Buratai argued that criminal groups operating in today’s world leave behind various forms of digital and physical footprints that can be tracked by competent security agencies. He explained that mobile phone communications, financial transactions, movement patterns, and intelligence reports can provide valuable information that enables security personnel to identify the locations and activities of criminal elements.
    According to the retired military officer, effective intelligence gathering remains one of the most important weapons in modern security operations. He noted that military force alone may not be sufficient to defeat insurgency and banditry, emphasizing that accurate intelligence often determines the success or failure of security missions.


    He stressed the importance of collaboration among Nigeria‘s various security institutions, including the military, police, intelligence services, and other law enforcement agencies. Buratai stated that when information is shared promptly and efficiently among agencies, security operations become more effective and capable of producing positive results.
    The former army chief also highlighted the role of technology in contemporary warfare and crime prevention. He explained that many countries around the world now rely heavily on electronic surveillance systems, satellite technology, drones, and sophisticated communication monitoring tools to combat terrorism and organized crime.


    According to him, Nigeria must continue investing in modern security equipment and intelligence capabilities if it hopes to overcome the growing threats posed by criminal organizations. He added that security agencies should be provided with adequate resources, training, and operational support to carry out their responsibilities effectively.
    Buratai further noted that insecurity has significant consequences for economic development and social stability. He said persistent attacks by criminal groups discourage investment, disrupt farming activities, affect education, and create fear among citizens.


    In many rural communities, residents have been forced to abandon their homes and farmlands due to repeated attacks by armed groups. This situation has contributed to food insecurity and economic hardship in several parts of the country. Buratai maintained that improving security would not only save lives but also create a more favorable environment for economic growth and national development.
    The retired general also called on citizens to support security agencies by providing credible information that could assist ongoing operations. He emphasized that community involvement is essential in addressing security challenges because local residents often possess valuable information about suspicious activities within their areas.


    He encouraged traditional rulers, community leaders, religious organizations, and civil society groups to work closely with security agencies to enhance intelligence gathering and strengthen local security networks.
    Buratai’s remarks have generated discussions among security experts, policymakers, and members of the public. While some observers agree that modern technology provides security agencies with powerful tools to track criminals, others argue that challenges such as inadequate funding, difficult terrain, limited equipment, and coordination problems continue to hinder effective operations.


    Security analysts have repeatedly emphasized the need for intelligence-led operations as opposed to relying solely on conventional military responses. They argue that identifying criminal networks, disrupting their sources of funding, and tracking their communications are critical components of any successful security strategy.
    Nigeria has over the years invested heavily in defense and security operations aimed at combating insurgency, banditry, kidnapping, and other violent crimes. Despite these efforts, security challenges remain a major concern in several regions of the country.


    Successive governments have introduced various initiatives designed to strengthen the nation’s security architecture. These measures have included the acquisition of military hardware, recruitment of security personnel, enhancement of intelligence capabilities, and increased cooperation with international partners.
    The federal government has also continued to emphasize the importance of technology-driven solutions in addressing insecurity. Recent years have seen growing interest in the deployment of surveillance systems, drones, data analysis tools, and communication monitoring technologies to support security operations.
    Experts believe that combining technological capabilities with effective intelligence gathering and community engagement could significantly improve the country’s ability to combat criminal activities.
    Buratai reiterated that while security challenges remain complex, they are not insurmountable. He expressed confidence that with proper coordination, adequate resources, and strong commitment from relevant authorities, security agencies can achieve greater success in tracking and neutralizing criminal elements.
    He also emphasized the need for sustained political support for security institutions, noting that long-term investment in intelligence and security infrastructure is essential for lasting peace and stability.
    As Nigeria continues to confront threats from bandits, terrorists, and kidnappers, the debate over the most effective strategies for addressing insecurity is expected to remain a key issue in national discussions. Buratai’s comments have once again drawn attention to the critical role of intelligence, technology, and cooperation in modern security operations.
    Many Nigerians hope that continued improvements in security capabilities will lead to safer communities, reduced criminal activity, and a more secure environment for citizens across the country. The challenge, according to security experts, lies not only in possessing the necessary tools and resources but also in ensuring that they are effectively deployed to protect lives and property.


    Sources:
    Security and defense reports, public remarks by Tukur Yusuf Buratai, and ongoing national security discussions.